The media will tell you that it cannot be possible for any correspondence to exist between media violence on the matter of Zimbabwean politics and the terrorist bombs in Mumbai. The media will tell you also that no correspondence can exist between the Mumbai bombs and the fact that the world’s best defence against terrorism is vacating his office at the White House to make room for a messiah mandated to substitute the war on terror with ‘hope’.
Yet the correspondence between those factors is very close indeed. And had not the media been tasked with preventing public awareness of those correspondences, the world would have been a very different place – one where murderous maniacs could not rule with impunity.
Informed observers, those who stand outside the media choir singing that Zimbabwe’s problems have something to do with unpopular leaders clinging to power and popular leaders failing to lift them out of the saddle – that is, observers who utterly disregard the media’s fairy stories, and focus on the ferocious covert dogfight between special interests from many parts of the globe for ownership of Zimbabwe’s totally magnificent diamond and platinum reefs – such observers know that India was punished for seeking to elevate its relations with Africa to a level beyond the graft and vice characterizing present efforts to prevent African economic development for the purpose of filling the pockets of its worst enemies with profits accruing from African wealth: the sub-continent’s British-owned, South African-based strategic mineral resources sector.
Surely the altogether extraordinary unpopularity that had been painstakingly engineered for Mr. Mugabe by resources sectors that control the global mass media in the perceptions of the international community is much more closely connected to that sector’s coveting Zimbabwe’s strategic mineral resources than to whether or not illiterate starvelings comprising the Zimbabwean proletariat ‘like’ Mr. Mugabe any less or more than they ‘like’ Morgan Tshvangirai?
One factor that hugely enhances the capability of those who covertly control the media to mystify the public with dissimulation is the economic innocence of some South African legal officials, who ascribe the country’s problems to the petty racial bigotry of simple people who at last learned that their victims will be prepared to suffer, and even to die, for freedom. The Mafia’s global leadership does not care a fig for those who wish to die for freedom. Its members daily maim and murder to their hearts’ content, through terrorism, HIV-Aids, cancer, and a thousand other primitive means, in order to get their hands on Africa’s enormous mineral wealth. They torture millions of people to the point of death with horrific pain levels sustained by means of telemetric applications of medical science – blasting their lives to the very Gates of Hell in the most lethal totalitarian regime ever heard or dreamed of on Earth. But the media maintain a thunderous silence on the horrific reality behind appearances, for the simple reason that they as little suspect its existence as does the public.
Legal officials should be obliged to remain abreast of the economic causes of political developments, so that they will not fall prey to dutifully parroting the media.
South Africa’s economically unsophisticated leaders and constituencies cannot gain access to the intelligence considered here, because barriers to perception are erected between all groupings by those who control the security services and legal institutions responsible for the dissemination of information on matters of national security – which, as has been shown in previous ports of this blog, happen to be the very same powers that control both the global resources sector and the global mass media. I daily watch the responses of men burdened with great responsibility, such as Mr, Jacob Zuma – responses which clearly reflect that my advice to them has been transmitted either in incomplete or in perverted form. I rationally deduce that those who wield the power over governments and electorates alike simply do not care to have their plans thwarted by observers who enjoy unencumbered visibility on their millennial designs.
My advice to Mr. Zuma has consistently been that he stand down – that he withdraw his candidacy from the presidential elections. Those seeking unconditional ownership of Africa’s mineral resources are absolutely ruthless. They will not hesitate for a moment to plunge South Africa and Zimbabawe into bloody civil war – an objective which could be accomplished, among other means, by charging Mr. Zuma with corruption after he has been appointed as the South African president, so that not only he will be destroyed, but the entire country with him. Even if Mr. Zuma is charged before the elections, his huge support base, the sub-continent’s proletariat, which has been indulged by the media for the purpose of fomenting division and stoking antagonism between communists and other groups, shall declare that it shall have no further part of the white man’s laws in this country. The result will be anarchy and bloody civil war, the long tried and tested, and now fail-proof recipe for global special interests in resources to retain power over all recently ‘liberated’ African countries. Only one course could have averted a blood-bath: steadfast refusal by the media to indulge illiterate starvelings with a drive fanatically championing the popularity and legitimacy of their preferred candidate, who, in the final analysis, constitutes an entirely arbitrary choice, since the personal identities of leaders are subordinated to the importance of the global constituencies represented by them.
Worse still, Mr. Zuma has personally set the precedent by which South African and other presidents can be fired at twenty-four hours’ notice. His chances of leading South Africa to success are at nearly zero, whereas his chances of delivering its livelihood into the hands of its enemies are at nearly maximum.
A fundamental barbarism characterises those who abuse the philosophy of liberal democracy for criminal purposes. The history of terrorism started a great distance away from the carnage of Mumbai. A brief note on its history may reveal something of its principal drivers’ national identities.
In the 1960s, the popularity of the British band The Beatles overwhelmed the world in a media campaign synchronized with the widespread abuse of LSD and marijuana – ‘Hippie’ culture. In the 1970s, the art movement abstract expressionism overwhelmed the world with a primitive vernacular idiom in every respect comparable to the hysterical media-driven phenomenon of the Beatles – synchronized with the widespread abuse of the lethal substance heroin, which was smuggled into the USA during the Vietnam war. TIME magazine’s Australian-born art critic, Robert Hughes, wrote in his book Nothing if not critical how Art News magazine reported in a hagiographic tone that the face of Yaweh could be seen peering at the viewer from between the red, yellow, and blue sections of Kenneth Noland’s painting of the size of The Last Judgement, ‘Red, Yellow, and Blue’ – and that if one could not see Yaweh, that did not mean that He was not there – it meant only that Yaweh does not show His face to goyim from the southern Pacific.
Thus music was perverted through relegation to the level of nursery rhymes, to prepare the way for barbaric assaults on the sensibility through massive decibel levels facilitated by modern electronic sound technology. Art was perverted through relegation to the obnoxious activities of wild men, who soon banished all legitimate art forms. Provisions deriving from those phenomena were attended by an increasingly authoritarian political correctness, whose ordinances rendered all things derived from Christianity, democracy, and the market economy abominable in public opinion, and rendered Islam, communism, and cartel economics acceptable substitutes to fill the gaps left where an Anglo-Saxon Calvinist culture previously flourished.
New Millennium conditions permitted the perversion of literature and film by means of the gigantically media-hyped Harry Potter series of books and films, which relegated literature and film to the level of a previously despised genre: the Gothic novel, the subject of Jane Austen’s masterpiece Mansfield Park, which warns that young ladies who read Gothic novels invariably come under the influence of hooligans, and land up in desperately compromised social situations. As has been stated in a previous port of this blog, the dramatis personae of the Harry Potter stories supply heroin smugglers and child molesters with a cast of roles for weird, darkly enhanced adults with whom to identify in extremities resulting from the ultimate horror of heroin addiction and entrapment in the child pornography industry that complements it. Thus literature has joined the company of music and art at a level of redundancy to which the Church has long been reduced.
Throughout the period in which those millennial changes came about, soap opera offered a perverted version of social intercourse to justify the sub-cultures needed to expand the market for heroin, diamonds, arms, and other forms of contraband, and to popularize the mendacity through which criminality is to be expanded in developed countries, and socio-economic conditions are to be exacerbated in developing countries.
Now the world has become accustomed to massive acts of war known as ‘terrorism’, which differs from other forms of warfare in that it is waged by one side against the other in every country of the world, rather than between two particular nation-states – but is never replied to in kind, because the identities of those responsible cannot be known even to Interpol, the Pentagon, and NATO. Concealed manipulators of the media have constantly sent America on wild goose chases after bearded Arab nationals and Russian KGB agents thought to have served as instruments in isolated atrocities – thus preventing intelligent thinking on the identities of those ultimately profiting from the carnage. As a result, the police services are to this day mystified by the prospect of correspondences between any two or more crimes against humanity – they display a studied ignorance of concepts of a centrally coordinated Global Organized Crime deploying terrorism as a big stick against those who fail to comply with their demands for ownership of the world’s strategic mineral resources.
My purpose in offering this blog, by which the media version of international affairs be daily contradicted, and the perspective withheld from the public be offered in its place, is to suggest a way in which those responsible for terrorism might be identified – namely to connect them with other forms of unconventional warfare and with the phenomena associated with unchallengeable reputations for respectability.
The public should long have suspected that the great song and dance made over figures who flourish the more as the fortunes of the US president, the Pope of the Catholic Church, the Queen of England, and the leaders of democratically elected governments correspondingly flag, and as Christian democratic culture increasingly flounders, could prove to constitute nothing but a Trojan Horse full of murderous Greeks clenching daggers between their teeth, waiting with rolling, blood-shot eyes for the moment when they will silently pour down the streets of the sleeping city in the light of the moon. But the diabolical pro-active dissimulation perpetuated by global mass media is simply too powerful for any sane perspective to remain beneath the waves of mass hysteria daily generated over side-shows that distract the public’s attention from essentials.
Another principal element in the strategy of war waged against the Christian West through the popular formats of its own media is the barbaric interpretation of Darwinism that has over the past four decades supplied the perfect alibi for a philosophy of the survival of the most brutish. That barbaric philosophy is perpetuated via dynamics by which all intuitions of a design behind the world’s operations are ridiculed and abased. One is expected to imagine that the intelligence behind natural phenomena, the laws of mathematics, chemistry, and physics, and behind the measured regularity and ingenious composition of covenants governing organic life – the changing tides of the sea and the moon, the regularity of interchange between day and night, sleep and waking, life and death, the well-appointed dualities characterizing the two genders, with the fateful content of their respective functions – not to mention the inexorable, ineluctable finality of the Moral Law guiding all live creatures toward a more just, more intelligent world through the effects of pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, damnation and salvation – that those are all products of mere happenstance.
That animals continually develop as a result of interaction with their environment is the last phenomenon that could be submitted as proof that the human race came about as an exclusive result of the most brutish volitions to be found in nature and the Universe. When seen in context with the other cultural elements listed above, the mendacity insisting on that view reeks of a coordinated attack on human intelligence itself. Those who have usurped the prerogatives of God for criminal purposes barbarously presume that because they can deceive their victims they can also deceive the forces that constituted them in their present incarnation on this particular planet at this moment in time. They continue obdurate in their barbarous convictions, because they could not otherwise justify their atrocities, even to themselves.
The assault on reason is today nowhere driven with more fanatic zeal than in obtuse communist cultures fostered in dirt-poor African countries cursed with fantastic strategic mineral resources coveted by the worst criminals ever seen on Earth.
Concealed potentates who despise uneducated Africans know very well that dull, un-cut and un-polished diamonds are worth precisely as much as their cut and polished brethren – although their shabby present appearance does not compare favourably with the deep brilliance of their lustrous counterparts. Those potentates know equally well that dull, uneducated humans are potentially worth precisely as much as their educated, accomplished brethren, whose vital ideas and capabilities render them highly valuable to society. Yet, although such despisers of Africans will rate all wanton discarding of un-cut diamonds as evidence of either unredeemable ignorance or insanity, they would discard underdeveloped humans without further ado – a sure sign that human affairs have degenerated to the level of absolute corruption and of imminent cataclysm. The human race will not permit technology to endure if it is going to be deployed as a weapon of war against those concerned with the fundamentals of existence rather than with extreme orders of experience exclusively.
In the next port to be written for this blog, whose title absolutely has to be Liberal Democracy and the Pain Barrier, it will be shown that medical science has long been usurped for criminal purposes by those who seek to deploy it as a weapon of war that must coerce the human race into acceptance of things that could never be acceptable to sane and morally intelligent people. It will be shown also that the legal system and the security services are subordinated to the vagaries of a totalitarian regime whose provisions make nonsense of any attempt to develop new military techniques for use in the settlement of conflicts: the human body is now attacked directly, secretly, from a distance, and with the unwitting but dedicated assistance of the target victim’s family and friends – without any need for the use of heavy, expensive metal machines designed for the purpose of destroying bodies in foreign countries.
Military war is no longer the worst horror to be found on Earth. Conservatism is no longer the most intolerant political view to be found on Earth, if it ever was that. Today war is waged by means never before associated with militarism, but rather with human rights and with programs of constitutional empowerment. Today the provisions of liberal democracy are abused by concealed, malign manipulators of affairs who aim to exterminate and to terrorise with massive bombs and other forms of slaughter. Anglo-Saxon culture has been destroyed by British criminal elements resolved to confiscate the world’s strategic mineral resources on grounds derived from their earlier experience as the stewards and governors of colonialism. Those criminal elements abused the Irish quest for independence in forcing Britain to covertly continue its colonization of foreign countries through confiscation of their mineral resources. Their modus operandi is to exacerbate socio-economic decay through the breakdown of discipline, so that evils can be introduced unseen and can be disguised as virtues through interminable insinuation by the mass media – obtaining purchase upon insufficiently protected national resources in the process.
The most important thing that the public now needs to realize is this: In a world where terrorism in India results from the frustration of criminal elements associated with British special interests to obtain Zimbabwe’s diamonds and platinum, the international police has a duty to require from the media that clear correspondences be drawn between matters presently given out as wholly unrelated, and that spurious associations be discontinued. The most recent terrorist attack supplies as good an example as could be wished for. Media-induced pre-occupation with south Asian politics will obfuscate the link with resources owners requiring compliance from India with respect to its African relations in the procurement of commodities.
The criminal element responsible for terrorism maintains its advantage through media strategy. It is as much as the International Police can do to remain ahead of a cynical game against criminals casting themselves into the role of righteous judges and relegating the police to the status of criminals. Similarly, the new American liberalism was brought about by the British resources special interests in control of the mass media under consideration in this essay, as the case also was with South Africa. The pretence sustained in the global mass media is that a benign liberal regime has made a contract with the developing world to rid it of a tyrannous conservative America, thus to bring about world peace and freedom for all. Unfortunately the USA was never half as tyrannous as the power now in control of the world, which confiscates the strategic mineral resources of the previously colonized developing countries that trust it.
The new American liberalism is therefore an abomination that will cost the human race its experiment with modernism. Humankind will return to life in a state of nature, for the simple reason that it is offered no choice in the matter: barbarism in possession of technology reduces the chances of human survival, whereas barbarism, or any other mode of being, without technology, does not threaten human survival. And barbarism has proved that nothing can prevent it from ascending to the level of absolute power in a technological world. Unless the media be subjected to rigorous testing for veracity in every matter reported upon, and severe punishments be prosecuted against those responsible for deception, modernism must necessarily fail. But it is late in the day to launch programs of that nature.
