Farewell, free trade

The leading editorial of the 20^th December 2008 issue of The Economist paints a bleak picture of the present global economic situation, which is characterized by a contracting of credit, a precipitous plunge in asset prices, and rapidly dissipating demand across the globe. Two trends are seen as particularly alarming: the rich countries are trapped in a severe recession that has scared America’s policymakers to the extent where they have cut the target for the federal funds rate to between zero and 0.25%. Emerging economies are faced with similarly deleterious conditions, not least as a result of plunging exports and a suffocating lack of foreign finance.

Further bad news is that open markets are under threat as never before in the modern era of globalization. The two engines of global integration, trade and capital flows, are ‘simultaneously shifting into reverse’.

Wrenching adjustments will be forced by that twin shift. The export countries responsible for the blow-out of the US current account deficit by which their growth was driven, from China to Germany, will slump unless they can boost domestic demand quickly. In economies with current-account deficits, financing will dry up as the result of a flight of private capital, and so also will export earnings.

The Economist warns that integration will lose its appeal when pain rather than prosperity flows across borders, and that governments will resort to the false comfort of protectionism. Governments will seek to divert demand from abroad with export subsidies, tariffs, and cheaper currencies in the hope of propping up domestic jobs and incomes.

But clear lessons are to be learned from history in that respect: economic isolationism will cruelly intensify the effects of recession or depression, as it did in the 1930s, when America’s Smoot-Hawley tariff was voted into effect. Although the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its multilateral trading rules are a bulwark against protection on that scale, “today’s globalized economy, with far-flung supply chains and just-in-time delivery, could be disrupted by policies much less dramatic than the Smoot-Hawley act.”

Under the section heading Fair Weather Free Traders, The Economist warns that the year is ending with no Doha round breakthrough in sight.

Scepticism with respect to open markets is a growing problem. Barack Obama and the new Congress, with its bigger Democratic majorities, do not inspire confidence in a future characterized by strongly pro-trade policies for America. The faltering exports of emerging economies may likewise result in a reduction in trade. “The WTO’s rules allow them plenty of scope: after two decades of unilateral tariff-cutting most of their tariffs are well below their ‘bound’ rates – they could triple their import levies without breaking the rules.”

Under the section heading ‘Handouts to the ready’, the threat to free trade is spelled out in graphic terms:

‘Politicians from Washington to Beijing are being pressed to help troubled industries, regardless of the consequences for trade. A bail-out of Detroit’s carmakers, whatever its final extent, will be a discriminatory subsidy. As China’s exporters go bust by the thousand, industries from textiles to steel have been promised handouts and rebates. Subsidies will beget more subsidies: Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s president, says that Europe will turn into an ‘industrial wasteland’ if it too does not prop up its manufactures. Subsidies will also invite retaliation. With China’s bilateral trade surplus at a record high even as America’s economy slumps, Congress will not take kindly to Beijing’s bolstering of its exporters.’

Nor do discriminatory subsidies comprise the entire infraction against the spirit of free trade. Exchange-rate movements could also prompt protectionist responses. The vexed issue of an undervalued yuan surfaces yet again. “A Sino-American trade spat is all too plausible”.

‘Add all this together and it is hard for a free-trader not to worry. So what is to be done? The first requirement is political leadership, especially from America and China. At a minimum, both must avoid beggar-thy-neighbour policies. Second, a conclusion of the Doha round would help. A deal would reduce the risk of broader backsliding by cutting many countries’ bound tariffs – and it would establish Mr. Obama’s multilateral credentials. Third, Doha deal or not, is greater transparency. A good recent idea is that the WTO publicise any new barriers, whether or not they are allowed by its rules.

‘The best insurance against protectionism, however, is macroeconomic stimulus. Boosting demand at home will reduce the temptation to divert it from abroad. By historical standards policymakers are acting aggressively, as the Federal Reserve did this week. But the effort is unevenly, and poorly, distributed. Emerging economies from which capital is fleeing have little room to boost spending. Some creditor countries (notably Germany) are holding back on fiscal stimulus, while the world’s biggest borrower (America) is acting the most boldly. A bigger push to boost demand in creditor countries coupled with more help, through the IMF, to cushion cash-strapped emerging economies would ease the world economy’s adjustment and brighten the prospects for free trade. In the 1930s protectionism flourished largely because of macroeconomic failures. That must not happen this time.’

The unfortunate state of affairs characterizing the current global economic situation came about through the dollar standard’s lack of an adjustment mechanism to prevent persistent trade imbalances, which in turn resulted in credit-induced economic overheating on a global scale. It is widely believed that the foundations for sustainable economic growth will not be restored until that flaw is corrected and the US trade deficit ceases to flood the world with US dollar liquidity. Therefore the dollar standard must be superseded by a new international monetary system that does not generate, or even tolerate, rampant credit creation.

Moreover, there is concern over the possibility that the cost of annual fiscal deficits will accumulate beyond control when lower, post-bubble tax revenues combine with higher expenditure on stimulus programs and social safety nets.

Yet media emphasis has obdurately remained on strategies by which the present crisis can be minimized, not on any urgent prevention of the same or similar crises in the future. In a brief article in the 20^th December 2008 issue of The Economist (page 114), former chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, reduces the nature of the crisis to the demise of global financial intermediation, “that intricate and interdependent system directing the world’s savings into productive capital investment”. Mr. Greenspan’s view of the crisis is summarized in these sentences: “The disclosure that highly leveraged financial institutions were holding toxic securitized American subprime mortgages shocked market participants.” As a result, bank lending, issuance of corporate bonds and a wide variety of other financial products, stopped. Credit-financed economic activity came to a standstill. “The world faced a major financial crisis.”

But Mr. Greenspan declines to supply any background on the true causes of the crisis, namely the preponderance of US imports over exports and the preponderance of Asian exports over imports – and the lack of a mechanism by which the dollar standard might have balanced such distortions. Mr. Greenspan’s solutions for the present crisis, namely to partially restore the $30 trillion of global stock market value wiped out this year, and to stabilize the price of American homes – which will in turn lead to the eventual partial recovery of global equities, “as fear inevitably dissipates” – apparently carry sufficient authority, and engender sufficient hope in the prospect that the crisis will go away, to render the need for addressing its fundamental cause a mere side-show in the minds of all concerned.

The cautionary tale of the Smoot-Hawley tariff’s deleterious effect, namely a dramatic reduction in trade, is permitted to overshadow the need to address not only the economic lacks and excesses bedevilling human life at present, but also all other elements of the unhappy relationship between developed and developing countries, as characterized by the building tensions between Christianity and Islam, Democracy and Communism, and the market economy and the cartels.

It is not known to which degree the stimulation of aggregate demand is encouraged, nor even whether the implementation of a minimum wage in the manufacturing sectors of export countries, by which it may be accomplished, is anywhere discussed as a real option. The threat of potential radical deflation that will result from continued erosion of aggregate demand, and the potential to end monetarism, which comprises the chief element of that threat, appear to be deemed a bridge that will be crossed if and when it is reached.

Also, the need for the authorities to learn how to manage the global money supply, and the possible use of Special Drawing Rights in that respect, receives no attention at all form the global mass media. Richard Duncan, the author of Dollar Crisis, wrote in 2003:

‘The global money supply has run amok, and must be brought back under control. Measures must be enacted to prevent persistent, multi-year trade imbalances. Lord Keynes, in the plan that he drew up for the Bretton Woods conference, recommended that fines be imposed on countries with current account deficits as well as those with surpluses, effectively to discourage both. This was part of his plan for a Clearing Union.

‘The Keynes Plan was rejected. Yet that same plan could now be employed to put an end to the enormous trade imbalances that presently destabilize the global economy. Deficit and surplus countries could be fined to incentivize restoration of balance to their payments. Keynes suggested that the fine should be 1% of the deficit or surplus. Should that not prove effective, the percentage could be progressively increased until balance is restored.

‘Policymakers need to put in place a system that ensures that equilibrium on the current account be maintained. Establishing a mechanism to fine countries with deficits or surpluses could be an effective means of achieving that objective. Alternative methods could be devised; the one chosen should be implemented without delay.

‘Of course, turning off the taps of the global money supply after so many years of rapid monetary expansion would deliver a terrible shock to the global economy. Steps will have to be taken to soften the blow. The goal is not to stop the increase in the global money supply, but to gain control of its growth rate, slowing it down to a pace which supports economic expansion while preventing its destabilization. A new method of regulating liquidity expansion is required. Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) could fill that role admirably. That international reserve asset is valued on the basis of a basket of key national currencies, and serves as the unit of account in transactions between the International Monetary Fund and its members.

‘Therefore a system is already in place that allows the IMF to create international reserve assets in the form of SDRs. It is hard to believe that such an ambitious, complicated, and exhaustively designed scheme was never agreed upon by the international community. Nonetheless, it is very fortunate that it now exists. SDRs should be made into an important economic policy tool.

‘The IMF could allocate SDRs with the specific intent of supporting economic expansion around the world. A supplement to global liquidity would certainly be necessary once new arrangements were in place to end trade imbalances. After years of very rapid expansion of MG, the global monetary currency, the world is prone to experience the monetary equivalent of the withdrawal symptoms suffered by substance abusers – global monetary expansion will cease all at once and as the US current-account deficit disappears, SDRs could be allocated in sufficient amounts to effectively wean the world off its dependence on the US deficits and the reserve assets generated by these. If you will, SDRs could serve as a kind of monetary ‘fix’ to assist the world in liberating itself from its dollar addiction.

‘It will not go unnoticed that this proposal must be categorized as monetarism applied on a global scale.’

It appears, however, that a plot has been hatched by which the establishment of a new global economic architecture may be circumvented. The most powerful covert element among those that drove the ‘hope and change’ brigade to a triumphant election victory by means of a tidal wave of media hype may have persuaded US policymakers to abjure their responsibilities, and instead to exploit the opportunity offered by concealed, malign manipulators of the media to obfuscate the fundamentals of a plan by which leaders of special interests, dealers in armaments feeding internecine wars around the globe, and criminal elements of the global strategic mineral resources sector may be brought to the ascendancy in a bid for world domination.

The USA is not in a position to appreciate the ultimate goal of the power manipulating the agencies governing its historical development in the direction suggested here. But a brief note on each of the categories listed above may shed some light on the matter.

Firstly, special interests. The article Barack Obama’s BlackBerry – Subject: Iran (page 76), demonstrates that a president elected on a peace ticket enjoys no advantage when pressed to protect American interests against rogue states whose leaders seek limitless control over feudal fiefdoms unaccountable to the requirements of democracy and market economies.

Secondly, dealers in armaments. The article on Viktor Bout, on page 51, is a stark reminder of just how unsavoury, not to say extremely odious, special interests can be when they serve maniacs who abuse the concept of business for criminal purposes. Bout supplied weapons to the Taliban while The Economist wondered why the mighty NATO appeared so pitifully inept against a rag-tag army of turbaned fanatics protecting the heroin trade against its global victim base. Bout abetted despots and revolutionaries in Africa and south America while those who paid for it reviled the targeted regions in the pages of The Economist. Bout aided Hizbullah in Lebanon and Islamists in Somalia while manipulators of American mass media extolled the virtues of Islam, and attacked Israel as ‘an apartheid state’. Bout even supplied American forces in Iraq – in order to render his victims complicit in his crimes at a petty level, so that the egg on their faces would prevent them from prosecuting him for crimes of gigantic magnitude elsewhere. Born in Tajikistan, Bout’s objective was said to be “not nationalistic, but to get rich quickly”. Apparently no objection can be found to crime when it brings in handsome profits for the criminals involved, even if the victims are left absroved, dehumanized, or even slaughtered, as the case has been with Africa throughout the past century.

Thirdly, criminal elements of the global strategic mineral resources sector. Concealed, malignant manipulators of the global mass media are directly responsible for the success of the alliance between global terrorism and the heroin trade, which protects a cascading array of other contraband, distributed from Afghanistan to Colombia and from Africa to Luxembourg – such as rocket launchers, surface-to-air missiles, and specially adapted helicopters, to be directly swapped for African blood diamonds in Sierra Leone. Is it any wonder that those manipulators provide so much mirth and gratification to the world’s bandits, revolutionaries, and mullahs when they mess with world leaders who seek to protect human nobility from the corrupting power of anarchy and abuse? Americans are prone to every possible form of diabolical insurrection from any number of its many national enemies, who are free to deploy unconventional strategies of war against them by means of the USA’s most popular mass media formats.

Yet, as a direct result of machinations by concealed, malign manipulators of the media who happen to control also the global strategic mineral resources sector, the World Court at the Hague will prosecute the poor deceived Africans who were given to believe that their people could be saved from the Hell and death that had engulfed them, by means of desperate military remedies made accessible by apparently sympathetic businessmen like Viktor Bout. With regard to African matters, the World Court should remain at all times mindful of a contemporary adage which asks: “Why should a poor, innocent man go to prison?” – and which replies: “To keep a rich, bad one out.” Viktor Bout was said to be worth $6 billion. The same cannot be said for his African victims.

In South Africa, the stupid racism inculcated in the white community, by means of totalitarian social engineering by concealed enforcers of an uncritical belief in all foul-mouthing of Africans in the global mass media, has finally resulted in the scourge of communism in that country. Moreover, communism will perhaps never be overcome, since the same manipulators have duplicated their communist deception in the USA under the same banner of liberal democracy. Now America, which had proudly deterred rogue states from harming weaker ones, languishes in sack and ash as a penitent fugitive before the league of nations.

In the pages of The Economist, morally upright German citizens are clapped into the same category as the rubble of city slums, who move about in the streets as gangs that assault police officers – as the direct result of a term invented and bandied about by the media wherever anarchy generated as insurrection against democracy confuses people, and turns them against their better instincts: ‘xenophobia’ – the concept by which community defence against invaders has been outlawed, and the world has been populated with teeming millions of homeless refugees. As may be expected, the success of that vile strategy of war has nowhere reached more spectacular proportions than in Africa.

In the homes of sober, morally intelligent people who advance the cause of law and order, cultural excrement is insinuated into their homes in the form of DVDs, through the violent peer pressure to which their children are exposed, and parents who know better than to permit such filth under their roofs are muzzled into submission – by a tyrannous political correctness, and by diabolical applications of medical science perpetrated upon them through techniques of social engineering that serve a bid for world domination by the worst criminals in the world.

All such things are made possible by the refusal to distinguish between crime and legitimate business. A terrible need for right conduct exists with regard to a thousand matters, of which the establishment of a fair and efficient global economic architecture is by no means the least. Trade does not deserve to flourish anywhere on Earth if criminals will dominate all its dynamics, and morally upright people will languish in a slough of misery as a result. The media have a duty to conduct public debate in a mode that clearly distinguishes between trade and crime, and that unequivocally favours trade over crime in every context. Unless that will soon become the rule rather than the exception, nothing that could advance the human cause will prevail, in economics or in any other field.

Africa’s loss is the Mafia’s gain

I was disappointed to learn that the Mafia was able to delay the publication of the previous port of this blog, Crime and the Communist state, for four days, because a mode could have been prepared for its reception in that time by which the effects of its disclosures and submissions could be neutralized.

Moreover, during those four days the Mafia was able to prepare a magnificent sermon, personalized for my education and delivered by mouth of the dominee of the church whose service I attended on Sunday – on the theme of the bitter water of Mara and the sweet water of Elim during the flight of Israel from Egypt: a metaphor of my obduracy in criticising the Mafia despite the dynamic of transactional management by which it prevents others from criticising it – a comprehensive reversal of the direction of causality of the Moral Law by which the creative powers of Nature have previously taught their creatures the disciplines of moral rectitude – a reversal enabling the Mafia to reconstitute the mechanism of trade-offs between the cost-benefit and risk-reward dynamics of the politics of experience into a regime through which the verisimilitudes of criminality are enforced upon contemporary societies around the globe.

The 20^th December 2008 issue of The Economist is a strong indication of the direction taken by Global Organized Crime in the propaganda war to be prosecuted in the implementation of its totalitarian millennium.

Perhaps the article on William Tyndale (page 63) is the best place to begin a criticism of the meta-texts imposed upon the issue, since it offers a historical perspective on which I could comment by way of introducing my argument.

As may be expected, the writers of the article seize upon the opportunity to discredit the Catholic Church, discredit the governments of Western democracies, and diminish the reputation of Sir Thomas More as one of the greatest Christian martyrs.

The Catholic Church was right to deplore the translation of the Bible into the vernaculars accessible to the uneducated lay public. Martin Luther was denied any efficient appreciation of the origins of modernism, which could be furnished only through knowledge of the historical event of invasions by savage pastoralist hordes from the Indo-European plains to the south-east, which overran western Europe, known as the Dorians, Iolians, and Achaeans, and the concomitant invasions of savage pastoralist hordes from the Balkans to the north-east, via Armenia, which overran the Mediterranean, known as the Hyksos – both of which movements took place between the late third millennium and early second millennium BC, bringing the Dark Ages over the known world.

Martin Luther was not therefore in any position to appreciate the strange convention by which Creation was thought to have taken place some four thousand years into the past; only in the twentieth century did scholars establish that the cataclysmic invasions of immense hordes of savages over vast regions, in which sea-faring mercantile civilizations have for perhaps forty thousand years governed their settlements more or less peaceably, resulted in the death of essential human nature and its resurrection as a new barbarism – whose febrile energies launched the direction of modernism upon the steep trajectory that may now perhaps become levelled off to a more sustainable curve through the effects of climate change and environmental degradation.

Therefore the Catholic clergy was right to censor the barbarous expressions of nation-building characteristic of the two millennia before the birth of Christ, during which the Hebrew priesthood gradually liberalized the Mosaic Law by expurgating the Prophets and retaining only the material from which the concept of rule of law developed – since civilization is founded upon the morally intelligent judicial tradition of the Pharisee priesthood, not upon the rough justice of the semi-barbarous Romans, who retained the raider’s code characteristic of the earlier savage pastoral invaders.

Needless to say, Protestants were also right to require complete access to the scriptures of their faith. Unfortunately conditions were not yet conducive to a comprehensive appreciation of the origins of the modern world, and Protestants paid a high price for that lack of perspective. However, the lack has been redeemed; the perspective has been restored, and at the same moment the purest form of the market economy evolved out of the Protestant work ethic, namely the one represented by the security analyst’s approach to value investment: the maximization of shareholder value through private enterprise in the market economy. If Calvinist democrats do all in their power to provide access to a broad base of their people to the insights provided by those two essential matters, they may remain at the frontier of human development, as the case has been since the advent of the Industrial Revolution.

The behaviour of England’s King Henry VIII is to be explained neither in terms of the development of commerce that moved the popes to assume secular pomp and to harness their political power during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, nor of the Lutheran Reformation in which the trend resulted, but rather in terms of the great barbarism of King Henry’s VIII’s mind – a function of racial interbreeding between ancient Europeans and the savage hordes of south Asia over some three millennia, which produced the criminal genes so vulgarly boasted of by those who now deploy primitive interpretations of Darwinism as a weapon of war against an unsuspecting law-abiding world.

The 20^th December 2008 issue of The Economist features a startling article on Viktor Bouts, a notorious arms dealer who seems to have functioned as one of many agents of the network responsible for the genocides by means of which the blood diamond cartels have crushed those seeking to resist the pillage of Africa’s magnificent deposits of strategic mineral resources over perhaps the past five decades.

The meta-text superimposed upon the article, found on page 51 of The Economist, cannot be appreciated unless the customary brief but lethal condemnation of Africa, featured as usual under the Briefing rubric, on page 16, be studied first.

In accordance with a long tradition fostered for the purpose, the blame for internecine warfare in Africa is placed squarely upon the governments involved in each instance. An impenetrable conduit of information has been laboriously put in place between the United Nations, on one hand, and informants of the blood diamond cartels, their deceived associates in the African media, and apparatchiki working with smuggler networks on the ground, on the other hand. The United Nations has no hope of learning the truth behind the appearances generated by the highly efficient criminal network feeding its lethal Afro-pessimism to the international community by those means. The International Criminal Court at the Hague has been likewise thoroughly deceived on the nature of African affairs by those who have long profited from the process of socio-economic decay through which the continent’s resistance to pillage of its mineral resources is continually weakened.

The two Africans singled out for particular abuse, General Laurent Nkunda and President Paul Kagame, are referred to merely as ‘murderous’, and implications of ‘corruption’ and ‘incompetence’ lie thickly padded between the lines of the text. The involvement of mining companies is mentioned only in terms of their association with the governments involved, not with the British-owned, South African-based, African resources sector responsible for the obfuscation of the horrific reality behind the anti-African, anti-government media propaganda fed to the international community with regard to the ailing continent’s affairs. Nor can culpability for the American failure to investigate the matter be placed where it belongs – with the liberal democratic faction – since readers of The Economist associate President Bush with all possible mistakes in international affairs, as a result of heavy conditioning and indoctrination throughout the past eight years, and associate liberal democracy with ‘hope’ and ‘change’.

By sickening contrast, Viktor Bouts, the man selected as the fall guy in place of the network of criminal, media-controlling potentates under the auspices of which he has operated throughout his career, is described within the scope of a single magazine article as, among other things, ‘extraordinary’, ‘intelligent’, ‘a star’, ‘a swot who relished success’, a ‘genius’, ‘prominent’, ‘mythical’, ‘famous’, ‘misunderstood’, ‘canny’, ‘concerned’, ‘loving’, ‘earnestly desiring’, ‘devoted’, ‘a stylish, subtle dresser’, ‘engaging’, ‘triumphant’, ‘flourishing’, ‘cautious’, ‘well-informed’, ‘poised’, ‘laughing’, ‘skilled’, and ‘keeping his name in lights’.

The dirty trick operative behind that technique of dissimulation depends for its success on a tradition fostered for the purpose through journalism, films, and soap operas, by the effects of which businessmen are to be revered, not for their extraordinary knowledge in economics, science, and management theory, as might be expected in a market economy, but for their allegedly superior genes, which enable them to behave blood-thirstily, as may be expected in a criminal cartel economy. In the 20^th December edition of The Economist a mighty effort is made to maximise the propaganda value of the said technique at a time when the economic staff have taken a well-deserved vacation, having prepared the excellent editorial, the equally excellent article by Alan Greenspan, the other brief articles on finance and economics, and the outstanding ‘Note to the Blackberry of Barack Obama’.

The article on angels on page 33 of The Economist is painfully devoid of purpose, being apparently deemed a necessary evil faced by a team tasked with supplying appropriate cultural fare for the festive season. It is addressed to a morally comatose vernacular consumer society happy to be dazzled by sensuous descriptions of apparitions for which no breath of reverence can be felt, since all higher realities have long been credited to unintelligent concepts derived from the work of Charles Darwin, in accordance with the dictates of some tyrannous concealed individual imagining that something can be gained from regimenting all readers into a single straight-jacket of conformity to a dull scientific regime.

The article ‘Why Music?’ was written from a desperately un-musical perspective, whose writers, like those who wrote the article on angels, seem to find criminality and sex more interesting than the topic under discussion in those two instances.

The writers of the article on page 67, ‘Of saints and sinners’, candidly relinquish every effort to deal with Christianity over the Christmas season, and find recourse instead in the pre-Islamic tradition of Sufism. The writers somehow manage never once to redeem the sordid tone of the article with any mention of the great spiritual beauty expressed through romantic love, which has flourished between noble men and women everywhere since time immemorial, during which period it happened to constitute the essence of the universal religion. Instead, apologies are made for the chronic abuse of hashish that seems to drive the current inability to reflect on the nature of the human source in the divine, as a result of conditions too primitive and oppressive to permit morally intelligent reflection on human experience.

‘The way the brain buys’ is introduced through a shameless attempt to incriminate honest retailers, doubtless in order to distract attention away from the noxious activities of hardened criminals. The phrases ‘a friendly welcome is said to cut shoplifting. It is harder to steal from nice people’ seem designed to blame personalized advertising in a context where target customers voluntarily enter the premises concerned. The inappropriate use of the word ‘sinister’ gives the shoddy plot away: it is an effort to obfuscate the real issue of the moment, which is that the global mass media have been deployed as a weapon of war during the most publicized presidential election in history – a strategy that could have facilitated the abuse of personalized marketing techniques to target the world’s most powerful politician for criminal purposes unknown to him – in a mode by the effects of which the malignant manipulators of the process have been piously mistaken for representatives of Divine Authority swooping down to Earth to intervene in human life through the effects of hope and change.

The long, dull article on page 117, ‘Why we are as we are’, identifies every phenomenon that could conceivably cause men to credit the Universe with the kind of extraordinary intelligence that must point to a design behind its powers, and credits Charles Darwin for the phenomenon discussed in each discrete instance.

The violent political expedients by means of which the patriarchal revolution was accomplished in the aftermath of the barbarian invasions of the early second millennium BC are today fanatically retained under false pretences that God had written every verse of the Bible – for the recourse provided by their provisions to a regime amenable to totalitarian social engineering on a global scale, particularly in terms of the provisions of Communism, Islam, and criminality. That strategy of war is nowhere applied more murderously than in Africa, and the governments involved in each case suffer no less from its effects than do the populations targeted for gross abuse by those means.

The true spirit of Christmas derives from the Catholic cult of the Holy Virgin, in which the relationship between mother and son is sanctified as the noblest one found in the human family, and is annually celebrated at the winter solstice as the Day of the Divine Child. The prerogatives of the mother-son relationship supersede those obtaining between husband and wife, in which the sexual element could taint the purity obtaining where man approaches woman with nothing but respect and gratitude, and woman perceives man with nothing but love and a need to protect and serve. They supersede those of the brother-sister relationship, from which the wisdom bequeathed by a member of an older generation to one of a younger generation is lacking, and the primordial covenant of child-birth is lacking from the equation. They supersede also the father-daughter relationship, which is vulnerable to the imperfect moral rectitude of man in relation to woman, who represents the moral officer of the household – which could in a patriarchal dispensation result in the rape or abuse of the daughter by the father, whereas its provisions remove that vulnerability from the mother-son relationship.

Even in a cynical, nihilistic, barbarous age, whose communicators fail to generate the enthusiasm needed to celebrate the central mystery of the faith that had brought the world to its point of highest development, the pretence that God had written every jot and tittle of the Bible is retained – whereas His Apostles and Prophets had written them under His inspiration – in order to provide for the oppressive Muslim regime envisaged, under which women will be required to continue hiding themselves from view, thus to appease men who fear being deprived of the right to mate, should they have to compete against other men under normal conditions.

The bid for the fearful totalitarian regime planned on behalf of all living by those now in control of the ghastly fraud is prosecuted through dynamics involving advertisements in which Sean Connery looks pretty for the cameras in celebration of the deleterious relations between north and south represented by the 007 James Bond film series; in which the character Brooke from The Bold and the Beautiful weeps rivers of tears when forbidden to forge more incestuous relations with her relatives; in which articles in newspapers and television programs make propaganda for Communism and cartel politics in a brazen insurrection against democracy and moral intelligence; in which religious sermons are tailored to ensnare those who could assist the Church in its fight against the Devil; medical science is deployed as a weapon of war helping criminals to usurp the covenant of child-birth in a bid to undo the work of Creation; enormously over-publicized court cases generate precedents for visiting abominations upon the human spirit, by which socio-economic decay is to be exacerbated in stricken communities for the greater profit of criminals from the heroin trade in the child market and from the proceeds of criminal industries such as child pornography; and the President of the United States of America is reviled in articles in reputable magazines for his willingness to protect the world against the worst criminals who have ever lived.

The Church sermon mentioned at the beginning of this port extended an invitation to me to embrace a more humane dispensation, in which my relatives will not continually be in danger of victimization and moral corruption by the Mafia. I wish to go into business and to excel as a community builder. I do not wish to be unnecessarily morbid. I do not wish to focus on crime and vice exclusively. I do not wish to see the dark side of human nature in everything that I experience. But hidden plotters of evil are messing with my world: with my religion, my culture, my children’s future. They revile everything that is holy to me. They abuse those whom I know to be innocent, they steal their sources of national wealth – and then they murder them. Therefore, unless I could feel certain that the process initiated by my speaking out on the issues comprising the contents of this blog is in safe hands, and will ineradicably continue until my cause prevails, I should wish to persist with doing all in my power to demonstrate how a morally intelligent world can be brought about, and to fight every effort by malignant manipulators to realize their sinister plan for the creation of a world in which the brutish alone may flourish.

The implied argument behind the agenda of the rapacious misanthropes under discussion, namely that Africans are not worthy of being spared, since they lag behind other cultures and races in terms of technological and economic development, does not hold water: it is a function of unreconstructed barbarism parading as heroism and nobility. Moreover, the misanthropes involved now seek to destroy the USA by the same means – and Americans can be accused of many things, but not of innate incompetence in all things. Unless the global mass media will attack criminality wherever it is encountered, instead of the need for law and order, Africans will be gradually exterminated in a bid by criminals to rule the world by means of dynamics conducive to nothing but a cataclysmic degeneration of conditions to a level suited to life among the beasts in a state of nature, in the cage of an arrested society.

Africa’s loss is the Mafia’s gain – not that of Divine Authority as represented by the global mass media.

Crime and the Communist State

Last night (Friday 19^th December) I dined with members of my family at a cluster home property overlooking a beautiful landscape featuring a prison complex – at which former colleagues of one of the guests happened to be incarcerated that very morning. My brother-in-law, a Bloemfontein detective, regaled us with the tale of how three of his colleagues colluded with hardened criminals to hit the kitty at the Montecasino gambling house in Johannesburg – stealing some twenty-one million rand – and how they attempted to frame him during the subsequent court procedures by alleging that he had supervised the crime.

I remember the incident well: a story did the rounds of how a gang of marauders arrived in smart cars, and set off a barrage of machine-gun fire for the full five minutes required to clean out the money that changed hands on that day at the gambling machines, subsequently to slip on to the highway directly beside the casino site, and to disappear from view before any member of the terrified public could recover sufficiently to make a telephone call. I remember concluding that the thing was managed in a military mode, much as would be any ambush upon some targeted settlement in a country at war.

I remember also how I was continually exhorted to visit Montecasino and to enter competitions throughout the period during which evidence was collated for the case.

The hostess of the meal enjoyed at the site overlooking the prison facility was my niece, who was continually menaced by a criminal force involved in the Livonia beauty salon that she ran with my daughter during precisely that period. Yet my family is permitted no least glimpse of the real nature of its involvement in the matter.

I have met a potential Black Economic Empowerment partner with regard to whom I receive suggestions that I should continue with the very same business venture that had moved me to warn the Commissioner of Interpol on the function of the medical profession in the perpetration of modern crime – an act prompted by observations of a mysterious force that impelled among other things the actions of the Zimbabweans who sought to become my business colleagues – who remained consistently unaware of the effects of that covert force on their lives. That act resulted in one of my sisters contracting the mysterious lung disease from which the then South African Health Minister, Dr. Tshabalala-Msimang, had briefly suffered during the period characterized by the most severe assault her credibility in the global mass media.

I must therefore conclude that I am presently being moved from one physical location to another during a time when no television viewing can be possible, for the purpose of being prevented from detecting the telling mismatches between news reportage on several of the matters mentioned here and the unfolding history of Zimbabwe and the involvement of the covert forces driving the MDC, which sought to take over my business venture in its capacity as a legitimate political party unseating a notorious tyrant in a righteous people’s revolution. However, I know very well that the force seeking to steal Zimbabwe’s diamonds is the force that hit Montecasino with so much contempt, and which derived so much propaganda value from reviling the South African Police Services regarding the local crime situation in the global mass media.

I know also that, had my mother not recently died of two massive thrombosis attacks, she would now have been in a position to draw conclusions with respect to a thousand events obfuscated by the media, and by tragedies and circuses visited upon her family and acquaintances over the past fifteen years, that could have assisted her in presenting damning evidence against the Mafia.

Let me hasten to state, therefore, that I shall not be found for being blackmailed into doing the bidding of Global Organized Crime in pursuit of any business opportunity. I feel forced to intervene in the rapidly exacerbating conditions of critically poor sanitation at landfill sites, since the enemy seeks to make the most of propaganda value derived from the outbreak of cholera in Zimbabwe. But I know that the cause of the cholera is also the cause of armed robbery in southern Africa, and of Afro-pessimism as hourly compounded by broadcasts in the global mass media.

The cluster home property where my niece dined her relatives last night accommodates a host of Chinese families – of which I would not have been made aware unless the authorities needed to confirm my intuitions on the involvement of Asian importers in the politics of Zimbabwe and other matters. I therefore feel eminently justified in concluding that the terrorist bombs in Mumbai were engineered by the mysterious force under consideration here: the bombings occurred immediately after I drew attention to the Indo-Chinese factor in the politics of Zimbabwe, and to the incongruity constituted by the media strategy preventing the public from making any connection between those matters.

The submission of the previous paragraph is not as preposterous as some would wish to allege. During the weekend of my mother’s recent funeral, my brother-in-law told of the involvement of Pakistani terrorists in the Bloemfontein crime situation. Two high-ranking police officers were killed on that weekend – one by means of suicide, and the other by means of cardial infarction. Yet when I asked why no connection could exist between that weekend’s war and the terrorist bombs in Mumbai, he replied: “Oh no, that was just the local gangs doing their stuff over here, nothing on a global scale, like Mumbai.” I reserve the right to draw my own conclusions rather than to rely on received opinion in the matter. And those conclusions include issues concerning the case of the late Hansie Cronje, the recent attempted invasion of world sport by the Mafia, and the nuclear arms agreements between India and the USA, in which Gillette, the sponsor of the television program World Sport Special, had been deployed as a weapon in a covert war waged upon the human race.

Members of my family are made to unknowingly revile President Bush by parroting the media on his alleged incompetence in my presence. Therefore I am left to conclude that the Mafia intends to continue obdurate with the ‘hope and change’ crusade by which it seeks to end the USA’s role as the world’s protector against terrorism and crime, and that no disclosure will be made of the connection between the politics of southern Africa and the gigantic wave of media-driven madness that produced the unfortunate result of the US presidential elections.

Nor did I doubt for a moment that the invidious demise of Lord John Brown of British Petroleum was closely related to the machinations determining events on the subcontinent of Africa during the past five years – events that concern a bid to seize ownership of African diamonds more than any other matter, despite the media’s attempts to dissociate it from the socio-economic decay engineered in Zimbabwe for the purpose of punishing Mr. Mugabe’s continued defiance of the powerful criminals responsible for his country’s woes.

Another reason why I am brought out of my isolation is that the arrangement worked too well for the forces of law and order: I can now be bribed with cookies, sea-food dishes, exotic pasta dishes, ice cream, and rich salad sauces to be positioned into protocols by which the Mafia prevents the authorities from putting my disclosures to strategic use. Should I opt to ‘snub’ my family by refusing to join it in festivities over the Christmas season, I could be shown to deserve the lack of family support in which it would result.

In order to elucidate the connection between the content of conversations among ordinary people and the agenda of Global Organized Crime, a brief perspective must be supplied on the changes that have come over the medical profession during the past century.

The American motivational writer on leadership, John C. Maxwell, writes on the life of William Osler, on page 104 of his 21 Indispensable Qualities of a Leader:

‘Osler’s book, The Principles and Practise of Medicine, influenced the preparation of physicians for more than forty years throughout the English-speaking world, China, and Japan. Osler’s greatest contribution to the world was to put the human heart back into medicine. His passion was to teach doctors compassion. He once said:

“There is a strong feeling abroad among people that doctors are given over nowadays to science; that we care much more for the disease and its scientific aspects than for the individual. I would urge you to care more particularly for the individual patient. Dealing as we do with poor suffering humanity, we see the man unmasked, exposed to all the frailties and weaknesses; we have to keep our hearts soft and tender lest we have too great a contempt for our fellow creatures.”

‘When Osler died, one of his British colleagues said of him:

“He was the greatest physician of history. Above all it is as a friend that during his lifetime we regard Osler; as one who possessed the genius of friendship to a greater degree than anyone of our generations. It was his wonderful interest in all of us that was his outstanding feature. It was from his humanity that all his other powers seemed to flow.”

Elsewhere in the same book, John C. Maxwell writes that a leader can be defined as one who would be prepared to give up everything except his integrity.

The principles entailed in those considerations are absolutely fundamental to the crisis now confronting the human race. After Osler’s death the results of experiments by Pavlov and others moved unconscionable operators to increasingly treat the human person as a mere guinea pig. That resulted during the second half of the twentieth century in the proliferation and distribution of potentially lethal hallucinogenic substances such as hashish, LSD, and heroin, around which a plethora of sub-cultures were spawned for the purpose of subverting the Christian way of life and replacing it with an oppressive regime premised on the basis of the victim’s biological submission before those covertly in control of effects prosecuting the ghastly fraud.

At last the trend resulted in a comprehensive reversal of the Hippocratic oath – as part of a cynical bid to control the human body for criminal purposes – by means of applications of biological sciences deployed in the agendas daily prosecuted by the security services in those dirty subterfuges deemed so eminently justifiable by the morally comatose public when applied to elements arbitrarily represented as ‘the enemy’ by concealed, malignant manipulators of the global mass media. Biological warfare has long superseded terrorism as the preferred form of coercion: individuals and crowds are alike subjected to techniques of totalitarian social engineering calculated to prosecute the inauguration of a millennial regime in which the effects of communism, Islam, and cartel economics will enable criminals to profit from societal vagaries on a scale never conceived of before, and in a manner against which resistance will not for long remain possible.

The alleged searing pity felt by the Mafia for animals abused by it as instruments of war deployed against its target victims likewise ring hollowly, since, like humans, animals are deprived in the process of the opportunity to pursue their natures in the interests of serving the Mafia’s sinister purposes. Humans are now subjected to conditions of absolute anarchy, in which dogs could ostensibly bark as if all Hell has broken loose at the mere hop of a sparrow in a patch of garden – but in which those events are covertly synchronized with the experiences of key human target victims, who are thus intimidated into compliance with the Mafia’s commands, as issued by means of personalized messages conveyed via the public media and via the communications of their own relatives, colleagues, and acquaintances in daily conversations. Thus the public is regimented as an aggregation of individuals subjected to effects explicable only in terms of the supernatural forces traditionally associated with religion and witchcraft – forces that terrify many promising individuals into abject mediocrity, and that shackle them hand and foot, confining them within the cage of an arrested society.

The regime thus prosecuted enables the Mafia to bring particular food brands into the use of key target victims, thus to control the dynamics of an apparatus designed to engineer political and economic changes of enormous scope and significance – for purposes thought by information-starved communists and Islam religionists to work toward their salvation and toward the demise of their democratic, Christian opposition. More importantly, morally comatose masses – particularly those comprising the influential Anglo-Saxon populations of the vernacular consumer culture deployed as the vehicle by which the sea-change is being accomplished – view the process as a much-needed reform, rather than as a strategy of war by which their previous resilience against criminality and anarchy is neutralized – a strategy which abuses their own favourite entertainment formats in the apparent security of their own homes, by means of a form of media equivocation amounting to comprehensive, fundamental deception, and thus amounting to warfare, since deception has long been known among strategists to comprise war’s whole art.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Cancer Ward announced that the scourge of the world had reached Russia – that no-one remained safe against oppression and malignancy from the secret constituency that had overtly confiscated all scientific knowledge, and had converted it into a weapon of war to be wielded against the human race by barbarian plotters of evil imagining that some sort of gain could be made from defeating the specie through murderous tricks and lies. Communism rapidly deteriorated to the status of a device by which access to efficient information could be denied to the populations of emerging countries, thus transforming them into instruments through which the market economy, democracy, and Christianity could be eviscerated in favour of the less efficient counterparts of those systems yet extant in underdeveloped regions of the world: Africa, the Middle East, south America, south Asia, and the previously communist countries of the Caucasus and the Balkans.

An attempt was made to reintroduce a semblance of humanity into the totalitarian social engineering techniques thus comprised, through a mechanism by which spectators could identify with the illusion of fame and fortune generated by means of morbid mechanisms operative in the imaginary, dysfunctional world of soap opera, where a deeply barbarous view of human nature has replaced the one fostered over many centuries by Christian culture and other conventions of recorded history – in which the novel has long functioned as perhaps the most potent civilizing force on Earth. The illusion of fame and fortune was elevated into an instrument through the effects of which those too intelligent to be lied to may be distracted through promises of wealth and celebrity from criticising the methods of organized crime – a criticism in which they feel compelled to persist in the teeth of mounting evidence of exacerbating socio-economic decay, being accustomed to viewing life as a whole rather than in terms of the legendary careers devised for media-created celebrities said to facilitate essential change away from the allegedly destructive stoicism of the USA and Israel, the two countries that had over the past several decades exemplified the conservative spirit as a bulwark against all forms of corruption.

Over the past fifteen years, South African communism has been positioned to supply a captive audience for a media strategy by which the lowest common denominator is exclusively addressed in a regime designed to effect change for the benefit of those seeking to exploit the insidious exacerbation of socio-economic conditions through criminality. South Africa had protected the African subcontinent against atrocities resulting from the interference of Soviet special resources interests in other mineral-rich African countries, which were imported into the continent by criminal British elements requiring an answer to the reforms introduced by Mrs. Thatcher – and which were styled as cures for an ongoing rapacious British colonialism, a propaganda ploy whose devastating efficacy is evident in the fact that president Mugabe believes it to this day.

That is why communism had to be introduced after the South African regime change had already been engineered, as if any reason could by then possibly be advanced for its existence, with both China and Russia comprehensively sensible to the vagaries of a system through which they had sustained severe setbacks in economic and cultural development. Serving as both a political and economic parallel to American soap opera and other popular media formats, in which the lowest common denominator has been addressed in cultural terms, South African communism now functions as a perceptual screen obtruding between the critical faculty by which the African proletariat interprets concepts of social justice, on the one hand, and the designs of concealed potentates seeking to absrove it of the wealth potentially constituted by the efficient mining and exporting of its rich deposits of strategic mineral resources, on the other hand.

In the light of the story with which this essay begins – the armed robbery at Montecasino – it is clear that uninformed communist demagogues on the ground in the South Africa of the 1980s were moved, during those desperate years in which none could foresee the future, to fundamentally compromise the African cause by agreeing to a deal with cynical elements pretending to represent Divine Authority swooping down from Heaven to take pity on the plight of Africans, but in truth representing the African blood diamond cartels – a precise replica of a deal covertly cut with many other African countries during the 1970 and 1980s, with consequences no less shattering for African economic development than those of the South African case.

That lowest common denominator is determined through a process by which the biological conditioning discovered by Pavlov in experiments with animals became the vehicle for establishing techniques of social engineering in terms of covert and telemetric medical manipulation of the human person. That conditioning operates as an element weighted in a scale of values by which a societal dynamic of transactional management is prosecuted on an ongoing basis between target victims and the covert, anonymous force manipulating their behaviour with applications of biological science programmed to result in major political and economic changes – implementing a bid for world domination by the global criminal force now coming into ascendancy in the United States of America.

As with African communists, the total extent of known costs and benefits entailed in any deal are deliberately and strategically hidden from the target victims by the manipulators, and minor fractions of that totality are presented as representing the whole, thus ensuring the lion’s share for the manipulators. Thus both the African continent and the USA are means of social engineering subordinated to a frightful totalitarian regime – under false pretences that the requirements for political correctness of a classic liberal democracy are served in the process.

Crime is no longer the conspicuous violation of human dignity and security that it was throughout all past ages. It is today committed unseen, under the guise of honoured societal conventions.

My late step-father, who had been subjected to gross abuse from medical science, a process in which he seems to have selflessly served as a conduit through which I built up a definitive body of observations regarding the role of the medical profession in modern serious crime, often regaled me with a ‘joke’ about the doctor who said to the patient: “I give you six months to live!”. The shaken patient respectfully replied: “But doctor, I will not receive my pension until the end of the year! How shall I pay you?” whereupon the doctor ‘relented’ by saying: “Very good, then I give you another six months to live!” That story seems to define the ordinary person’s plight: he is standing in full view under fire from lethal ambush, yet his docility and conformity move him to invest the media and the medical profession with absolute trust – thus neutralizing the terrible urgency with which he should view the situation.

A major film release of the late 1990s, The Firm, featuring Tom Cruise, pretended that American Big Business is responsible for the culture of business as crime, and crime as strategy of war as waged upon society in general. Nothing could be further from the truth: the culture examined in that film exemplifies the USA’s competition, the criminal cartel system – that is, the Mafia – to a degree that renders it far more recognizable to South Africans than to typical Americans.

The media are so busy blaming the widening gap between rich and poor on the market economy that the legal system has not even begun to address the horrors that result from the rapidly widening gap between crime and punishment in the current social dispensation.

Nothing could be more urgent than the need to establish an alternative media that must address the common underlying cause beneath the deleterious effects of all the elements discussed here.

Commissioner Selebi and the Mafia

I may be forgiven for directing this port to the specialist readers for whose benefit I am permitted to publish my blog; some personal matters are obtruding upon my ability to continue supplying information by these means, and I need to address those in what may seem like code language to the ordinary person. I am bound to be criticized for writing ‘mysteriously’ or ‘oracularly’.

Only the Mafia enjoys freedom of speech; all other parties and individuals are doomed to voice the perceptions, opinions, and sympathies required for prosecution of the hidden agenda by which the Mafia gives currency to its bid for world domination. As a result of that perversity, the media have throughout the past decade made a great song and dance over the South African proletariat’s inalienable right to self-expression – yet that apparent kindness has starved the economy of the vital factor of production comprised by regular, reliable labour for the manufacturing sector. As a result, the poor, who depend on the economy for grants made available through the redistribution of taxation revenue, have suffered.

In daily conversation derived from media coverage of events, the above statements will not be often encountered. They jar with the current media version of affairs: in terms of public opinion derived from the media version, the Mafia came into existence only when the Commissioner of Police was attacked for his alleged relationship with it. And communism is the world’s saving grace. Unfortunately those statements do not merely comprise the paranoiac ranting of a slavering Christian capitalist democrat – they are substantially correct.

A cursory glance at the techniques deployed by modern security services could supply the requisite context needed to avert misunderstanding over the intended sense of these submissions. Yet that glance is best facilitated through a brief survey of the ordinary individual’s personal experience.

In the vaunted modern information economy, the ordinary individual’s experience is constituted of a landscape and a climate conjured by the global mass media. Those who take note of the perspective offered in this blog have gained visibility on the ease with which concealed manipulators of affairs can direct the flow of conversations between ordinary South Africans into mind-sets that paint all members of the public sector with the same broad brush, precisely as the case was during the Apartheid years, when whites were free to revile Africans to their faces in conversation, who were obliged to mutely proceed with their work throughout the duration of each renewed attack as if they did not exist. When I discuss current affairs with a friend or relative, my observations and analyses are summarily negated when the conservative president Mbeki is categorically identified with the opportunistic populist adventurer Mr. Zuma, the over-protective Mr. Mugabe with the misguided Mr. Hugo Chavez, and the Commissioner of the International Police with the Mafia – since the media generate those impressions and reiterate them ad nauseum.

Moreover, such paralysis of the moral and critical faculties do not result from anything so basal as mere stupidity – the incongruous utterances comprising conversations throughout the country are directly injected, through telemetric manipulation of sensibilities and neuro-muscular systems, into the national body politic, social fabric, and cultural idiom – through the applications of biological sciences by means of which security services daily prosecute their national and global diplomatic agendas.

An interminable course of blackmail is sustained by which special observers are made aware of the effects that a change of clothes or the taking of one meal rather than another exercise upon the health and well-being of relatives, as announced through telephone calls overheard directly after the change of clothes or taking of a meal, as the case may be on the day. “You are what you eat, and you are what you wear”, has become the pathetic state to which the human race is reduced in the New Millennium, because a totalitarian regime is coming to ascendancy through the amenities provided by the present vernacular consumer society. The purpose of the mad scheme is to ensure that no free thinking shall be possible – no freedom of speech, no freedom of movement, association, or choice. No freedom shall be possible.

In my capacity as a special observer, I am accustomed to being moved about with my few earthly possessions in order to assist the Mafia in immobilising me whenever I make the world too hot for criminals who abuse their power with impunity and blame the effects of that abuse on government leaders and business leaders. In the current phase of the regime governing my experience, I am pressured to refrain from divulging the crimes that are visible to me alone through abuse of my family, whose dogs and cats are deployed as instruments in the process. Their coming and going are functions of my actions – an arrangement to which their owners are oblivious. The animals alternately lick my hands or bark at me and sweep their tails through my face – depending on whether I capitulate before the Mafia’s commands, falling to the status of a toy car radio-controlled by a child, or whether I stubbornly reserve the right to continue existing as an unaffiliated sentient being with a mind of its own. Nearby parrots whistle tunes suggesting outcomes promising to be propitious in the case of my compliance with commands issued by criminals through the public media, through outdoor significations, or through the mouths of my relatives – and promising to be ominous in the case of my non-compliance with them.

Telephone calls to my relatives announce either deliverance or dire consequences, again depending on whether I in my capacity as a target victim have elected to rebelliously assert my humanity or to obediently relinquish it. Relatives abuse their clients or employers during loud telephone conversations with colleagues in response to promptings executed through applications of biological sciences of which they are totally unaware – by which my precarious situation is precisely reflected in a device by which I am to be intimidated into compliance with the Mafia’s mad scheme.

Special observers know that it would be better to live in a parking lot while continuing to resist the violence and intimidation with which the Mafia is free to prosecute its hidden agenda, due to the conspiracy of silence to which the security services of every country in the world is held, than it would be to live in a paradise while selling the world down the toilet bowl of history with every passing day in which the option of making disclosure is declined.

The obnoxiousness of criminals who continue obdurate in manipulating my family despite evidence in my writing of knowledge of the nature of criminal techniques, moves me to persist in the grim task of exposing every dirty trick, as and when implemented, through which the public is abused by traitors of the Christian West, who take advantage of their reputations for unchallengeable respectability in the top ranks of the global security establishment, of the immense capital power afforded them by the proceeds of their countless crimes, and of the gigantic influence wielded by them as controllers of the global mass media. That obnoxiousness makes me realize that a bid for world domination is under way beneath the very noses of the custodians of Western values.

With respect to my personal circumstances, one of my two sisters is given to believe that she fights crime in the insurance industry. Maintained on the absolutely minimum salary possible, and harassed and abused throughout every merciless day of mindless work by her Mafia-duped boss, she is constantly confronted with cases in which petty criminals hope to beat the system by getting paid out for crimes disguised as insured accidents. My sister prevails against all odds, braving the violent threats incurred in her dealings with the petty criminals, which gives her the impression that the efficiency of the legal system privileges her to defy the criminals’ gumption. Of course the Mafia absroves the country by letting their petty criminals get away with every case handled by other insurance assessors on a daily basis, while extracting the lion’s share of the profit from every transaction for themselves exclusively.

The healthy contempt that my sister feels for me as the unemployed family hobo enables her to hold forth in conversations with me in a manner that suits the criminal agenda to perfection, thus unknowingly supplying an endless stream of material by which the Mafia proves its magnanimity toward those who know too much, such as I. She is manipulated to indulge her dogs with sentimentality and unwarranted pity, thus to unconsciously facilitate the maximum torture that the Mafia could engineer for me from the situation, as the case also is with her two daughters in their dealings with me, at a much subtler level – leaving me to curse Walt Disney’s sentimental, syrupy, yet violent comics, which supplied the Mafia with license to invade both the kingdom of childhood and the animal kingdom by means of its vulgar sadism through diabolical applications of medical science.

My sister could be persuaded to resign from her job at the drop of a hat, as the result of years of cruel torture endured as a target victim in prosecution of the Mafia’s agenda. That would necessitate my taking whatever menial day job is accessible to one forbidden to speak of his life’s work, in order to earn a living. Whenever I try to explain something of what is going on in my sister’s tragically futile life, she experiences paralysis in her right arm, and I am obliged to desist, returning to the heavy idiocy of a relationship in which nothing that I learned in a lifetime of consummate observation and interpretation of experience is permitted to benefit my relatives.

Is it any wonder that I know how the Mafia obtains its effects?

My other sister, who is married to a prominent detective and lives in Bloemfontein, is a famous science teacher who wins the award for the best teacher in the Free State every year. She is given to believe that she wields sovereign sway and masterdom throughout her wide dominions: none of her adversaries ever prevail against her in daily confrontations – she deftly dispenses justice wherever she goes; the world is her oyster. However, in her life too, as in that of my other sister, nothing whatsoever happens that is not directly linked to me. She too, like my other sister, works herself nearly to death on every day of her life, as I also did until I realized that mindless work is calculated to keep intelligent people from thinking – and, like my other sister, she is the victim of severe deception with regard to her children’s’ situations and the nature of her relationships with them.

Naturally, whenever my scientific sister sees me, a special pity for the world’s family hobos overcomes her, and she is moved to worry whether I might find a job as a factotum at some boys’ hostel, or might find a little place at the coast that could be maintained on the salary of a bar-tender at some sweet little pub overlooking the sea. Yet I am called upon to live with the knowledge that the assault on the life of the South African Minister of Health by means of a mysterious lung disease was first tried on my sister, to punish me for sneaking a note to the Commissioner of Interpol on the medical nature of modern crime, a matter that I dare not mention to my sister for fear of tragically complicating her life while she is yet permitted some measure of happiness.

Whenever I try to disabuse my sisters with a supply of efficient information on the nature of a malignant dispensation against which no cure might be applied ever since the regime change engineered for that purpose with the presidency of the first black South African, I am confronted with advertisements showing violent car accidents and warned that although I might hope that such things could not happen to me, they clearly can, and will, happen to me.

My parents – my mother and my step-father – were likewise made to believe that they had some special standing in the fight against crime, although everything that they held dear was sadistically destroyed in an inexorable spiral of deception and violence.

My step-father, who knew and loved the Zulu leader, Dr. Buthelezi, watched all that he worked for throughout his lifetime of carefully maintained relationships between black and white gradually fall to ruin as the result of passions elicited in me, his step-son, through a scheme by which I was made to believe that he, and not the Mafia, of whose existence, like other South Africans, I was unaware, was responsible for my invidious and inexplicable demise at my place of work. Yet throughout the time when I lectured at the Johannesburg tertiary institution involved, my step-father held the position of the national director of Education and Training.

My mother was long ago wrenched from her commitment to protecting her children, through a devastating car accident on a road where her closest friend, Val van der Watt, the mother of the dynamic former Springbok winger Andy van der Watt, was grotesquely killed soon afterwards. Two years after my mother’s accident, her brother, the mainstay of my family’s well-being, was killed in the most savage car accident in the country’s history until that time, and my mother became a militant racist as a result of the media propaganda against the drivers of vehicles deployed as instruments of death in the Mafia’s continual war against the societies absroved through its crimes.

The relationship between my parents and I were likewise constantly manipulated to set them in antagonism to my needs and to the political convictions determined by my extraordinary experience. My parents were harrassed and oppressed to the last days of their lives, and made to leave this life laboring under severe delusions with regard to both their own positions and mine.

Please excuse me if I know precisely how the Mafia erects the barriers to perception in every relationship in every state department in every country of the world, by which it prosecutes its agenda in ways that could with perfect credibility be blamed on the leaders of democratically elected governments – and if I know precisely how much truth the global mass media transmit to the public in that respect.

My experience with the Mafia began a full lifetime ago, when my parents were driven apart by a divorce engineered to ruin the Calvinist church represented by my family: my step-father, who was a prominent dominee in the official national denomination, was moved to fall in love with my mother. Yet their relationship was increasingly under threat from vulgarities that assailed it at every turn of events throughout their lives.

After my parents’ divorce in the first year of my life, my grandfather, a wise and respected community leader of the Eastern Free State, was killed with cancer. When my parents collected my sister and I from my grandmother, we moved in with them in Pretoria, where my step-father studied. We then moved to Kwazulu-Natal, where I soon found a beloved friend in the son of the local doctor. I was invited to enjoy a jaunt in a light aircraft with them, and was privileged to wave from the sky to my mother and sisters where they stood in our back yard. But soon after that excursion the doctor was killed with cancer. My friend was utterly destroyed, and soon moved away to East London, leaving me to grieve.

At the age of nineteen I was finally permitted to meet my biological father in Switzerland, where he lived. He worked in the Department of Information; I monitored the media with great concern over the infamous ‘Information Scandal’ through which Prime Minister John Vorster was destroyed and killed in much the same way that Hansie Cronje, the famous and loved South African cricket star, was destroyed and killed many years later. Yet when the plane on which my sister and I flew to Switzerland landed at Lisbon to take in fuel, paramilitary vehicles swarmed all over the runway, and militia armed with sub-machine guns boarded the plane and searched it. When I finally met my father, he was shaken by the realization that the Portuguese communist Coup d’Tat was synchronized with his meeting his children: the year was 1975. I subsequently learned from my father that he had previously spent his holidays in Portugal.

My father took my sister and I on a journey through Europe. During that vacation, his black Mercedes Benz, which sported a DC registration number, was pulled off the German autobahn by a traffic officer in a Porche, and my father was treated with considerable disdain. I learned recently to associate that event with the point at which the power of Global Organized Crime superseded that of democratic governments in the battle for influence over the hearts and minds of the world’s people.

When my father took my sister and I to a film show in Bern, he was again treated with some disdain, that time by the citizens of Bern. I learned subsequently to associate that event with the corruption of the Swiss banking system by the South African diamond cartels, which extended favourable treatment to Switzerland in exchange for non-disclosure clauses protecting criminals seeking to launder or hoard dirty money obtained through deals paid for with the lives of millions of Africans who fell in atrocities perpetrated by the murderous diamond cartels over some five decades. Worse, the world saw nothing of those atrocities, due to primitive conditions into which progressive constituencies could not send media teams, and had to rely on the version provided by the South African resources sector, which controlled the media.

I realized also that the South African Information Department was one of the most efficient drivers of economic growth ever seen in the world, and that it had to be destroyed in the interests of a bid for world domination by criminals associated with the South African cartel economic system, which could not bring itself to permit economic competition to encroach upon its operations, even if it had to subject an entire race to the vagaries of its oppressive regime.

My sisters knew nothing of the personal history by which I obtained so much insight into the way that the world is presently constituted. My parents likewise knew nothing of it. But my biological father was an astute diplomat. On the last occasion when I saw him, I was moved by constant torture that preceded the event to drink a little, and he mistook the profound exhaustion of my soul for evidence of a reprehensible character. He bitterly attacked me, branding me his shameful son. I subsequently realized that he had made it possible for me to realize that I was abused in a regime by which my country was betrayed in deepest consequence – for the next news that I received about my father was of his death from lung cancer.

Even now a tune by the ‘eighties band Fleetwood Mac turns in my head. The words, “Listen carefully to the sound of the heart-beat that you know” reminds me that a stranger’s heart could be transplanted into my breast and I would lose the memories of a full lifetime, which will be replaced by those of the donor. As I have often said: the Mafia wishes to rule the world unconditionally, and it does not intend to be stopped.

Which returns the argument to the Commissioner of Interpol and the Mafia.

It is not always borne in mind that all the things of which I write contradict the media version of a South Africa rescued from long oppression through a timeous regime change. I was not a despised black South African during the years in which the experiences by which my life is defined unfolded – and I am not one now. I suffered indignity and oppression from a concealed enemy although my people, the Afrikaners, were blamed for everything that ever went wrong in my country – even as the new black government is now blamed. Therefore I feel obliged to emphasize that the truth is not always served in media reportage on events regarding the sub-continent, and that the public is sometimes subjected to comprehensive, fundamental deception calculated to exacerbate socio-economic decay in order to benefit criminals who exploit the vagaries resulting from the process for increased profit.

I have no hope of learning how things stand with respect to the complex relationship that the Chief of the International Police must necessarily maintain with Global Organized Crime. But I do know that responsible and well-informed observers dare not believe that media reportage on the matter could be deemed anything but an unholy charade. In a sane world the public is not led to believe that the Chief of Police – the final barrier between them and the Devil – must be declared a dirty criminal on strength of media speculation alone, as may now happen in South Africa. That makes things very difficult for me, because in a sane world people also do not change the world’s protector against rogue countries in the belief that the world would be filled with hope as a result – and that has just happened in the USA. Therefore the public would think that I am crazy long before it would think of the world as being crazy. Yet, immediately after the USA became a land of ‘hope’ and ‘change’, terrorists bombed Mumbai. And it is early days yet; the terrorists may have more in store for a world that would boldly hope for change. Therefore it may after all be unwise to believe criminals who contend that the chief of Interpol is responsible for the Mafia’s crimes simply because they control the majority of the world’s media.

Democratic governments experience an urgent need to inform their electorates of their vulnerability to criminals seeking to deceive them for the purpose of achieving absolute power. But the security services enforce a legislative proscription on all attempts at issuing such information. That proscription is destructive and must be lifted at all costs. Unless the public learns that it is not safe to uncritically invest the media with absolute trust, the modernist movement will be confronted with the threat of failure, and the world could return to a state of primitive barbarism last seen many thousands of years into the past.

Mr. Mugabe’s Indo-Chinese connections

Concealed, malign manipulators of the media continue to present Mr. Mugabe to the international community in terms of his defiance of Britain, the USA, and France – the three countries against whom none may transgress who wishes to curry favour with the progressive global constituency. It is therefore safe to assume that Mr. Mugabe relies solely on the chief importers of his country’s great mineral wealth: India and China – that a deal has been cut by which very powerful Asian special interests derive sufficient satisfaction from Zimbabwean resources exports to provide a bulwark against Western liberal democracy.

Extraordinary complexities attend the issue as a result of the covert nature of the British-owned South African resources sector, which daily compounds the problems confronting all who seek to break the deadlock by means of political efforts. Manipulators of the South African media would not have sought to obtain maximum mileage from Zimbabwe’s ‘they can go hang’ rhetoric with regard to the UK, the USA, and the EU, had they not hoped to be perceived as representing Great Britain in its capacity as the world’s pre-eminent repository of the moral high ground. The most unfortunate corollary to the situation is that the reputation of Western capitalism, that is, Christian democracy, and particularly Anglo-Saxon Calvinism, is tarnished in the global mass media.

The chief problem in the matter is that the public is utterly deceived with respect to the strategic implications of developments on the sub-continent, since, as a result, Global Organized Crime is free to mobilize herd momentum for spurious causes to produce outcomes propitious from its point of view, but hopelessly counter-productive from the point of view of all whose futures are tied up with the socio-economic realities of the region.

The South African Communist Party hugely exacerbates the chances of regional governments to address the real issues involved, because a reversal of the direction of causality between the relations defining politics and economics confounds every effort at establishing a wise, efficient deal between owners (and aspirant owners), producers, and importers of African strategic mineral resources and commodities needed by the emerging Asian giants. Dr. Blade Nzimande continues obdurate in prosecuting a tendentious expedient: he has jumped on the rhetorical band-wagon by which the market economy is equated with criminality, and communism, which parasites upon capitalism for its very survival, is equated with the moral high ground – a studious insistence on precisely the article of faith whose effects happen to suit Global Organized Crime better than it suits any other single member of the global network of stakeholders, and whose effects happen to suit the native populations of the mineral-rich region more poorly than would those of any other choice of an article of faith.

Dr. Nzimande is a consummate professional politician. He knows as well as anybody that politics are a function of economics, but that the matter does not work the other way round – as may be proved beyond doubt by considering the success with which decisions taken by Russia, China, and India have been rewarded over the past decade. Dr. Nzimande likewise knows that nothing would benefit the South African proletariat more than a comprehensive education program by which science, economics, and management theory be made accessible to the broadest possible base by the most efficient means. Yet that course of action would not recruit members for the communist party or labour unions – on the contrary, it would disabuse South Africans of their proclivity for making demands on government, and would galvanize them into a concerted effort to improve productivity to the point where demand would be created for their manufactured goods in efficient import markets.

Nor do such matters comprise arbitrary alternatives in an array of possibilities; all items of the hidden agenda by which organized crime prosecutes the outcomes advancing its bid for world domination are loaded to favour those who thrive from the exacerbation of dangerous socio-economic conditions, to the detriment of those who seek a just, intelligent society for the majority of the world’s people. When communists righteously hold forth on the moral bigotry of those who champion the tenets of the market economy, right-thinking, well-informed value-creators are disadvantaged, and the societies that would benefit from their input suffer as a result.

The 1990s film of the title Starsky and Hutch features a scene in which a criminal explains to the two naive young law-enforcing heroes of the title that the smart set in Luxembourg, which is envied by the entire world, does exactly that which all other criminals do, even those whose shabbiness make them seem to stand worlds apart from their fine-feathered Luxembourg counterparts. But that ruse fools criminals only. Luxembourg is no example of the market economy; it represents the heavy feudal oppression and corruption of European family businesses that are so vociferously defended against the market economy policies of the USA in the global mass media.

In South Africa, ‘advice’ of a similar nature is on hand at every supermarket. Customers are reassured that crime is in the eye of the beholder – that apologies for barbarism are as ubiquitous as the individual aspirations of those who allegedly commit crime. Yet that ruse likewise fools criminals only. Business is legitimate if it intends to optimally benefit the greatest possible number of the most deserving people. Luxembourg is best viewed as a collection of individuals seeking personal gratification through the medium of wealth – individuals who create organizations fit to deliver that outcome, and who dissolve them as soon as the public seeks to hold them accountable for their actions, to form new unaccountable organizations in their place. Therefore, although it presently enjoys the support of the global mass media, Luxembourg must at some point in its future necessarily trend towards the inefficiencies of criminality. Wall Street lost its balance, and, although it will be bailed out and possibly continue intact, those who most violently pursued its objectives ate the dust of iniquity: they saw their cause defeated by adversity, having been found unequal to the vagaries of necessity. But the same cannot be said of Warren Buffett, or of a significant number of people who, like him, sought to do the right thing for the right reason, and to consistently do it better than the competition.

The ‘most deserving people’ to benefit from value creation invariably comprise the large body of responsible pensioners who have worked for the public good over a lifetime dedicated to improving societal efficacy. Shareholder value must be maximized in order to produce pools of capital for investment. That does not mean that arcane or exotic high-risk instruments should be constructed out of debt funds backed by no real assets, or that other dangerous experiments with cheating the laws of physics should be encouraged. But it does mean that shareholder investors are more deserving of the fruits of value than are robber barons who oppress the society upon which they prey. It means also that securitization and the swift re-allocation of capital in quest of improving productivity and growth must be strategically deployed, yet in the most risk-conscious manner possible, and that constant speculation and arbitrage must clear the market of price inefficiencies – thus to explore all possible means by which additional capital production may be generated without disadvantaging or oppressing others in the process.

The global mass media have a duty to inform the public accordingly, yet they do nothing of the kind – they hourly incriminate steps taken to ensure societal efficacy, and pro-actively exacerbate socio-economic decay in all countries of the world. Globalization would have worked if an international market economy were established in a democratized world operating in league with Christian principles. But globalization is not working, because an international criminal cartel economy is being established by means of a communist revolution, which favours Islam as a more effective vehicle for the protection of monopolies against competition of any nature, and for the regimentation of masses by means of totalitarian social engineering – in a covert drive to direct the effects of all instruments of power, determinants of wealth, and amenities of culture into the accounts of concealed, oppressive criminals exclusively.

In the process the Judaeo-Christian ideal of an intelligent society is eviscerated in order to ensure that resistance to a malignant criminal rule will never again be possible.

The Wheel of Fortune is about to complete a cycle that began more than three thousand years ago, when the barbarian invasions of Europe and of the Mediterranean brought the Dark Ages over the ancient civilizations that formed the backbone of the human race for possibly forty thousand years into the past. The ancient sea-faring societies – known in aggregate as the Pelasgian race, the most famous of whose mercantile cities was Troy, which was situated at the gateway between Europe and Asia, at the Dardanelle (known in Homeric times as the Hellespont) – those societies were cataclysmically overrun by naked savages driving enormous herds of cattle before them, with which they had travelled over generations across the vast Indo-European plains and the mountain-ranges of the Balkans respectively.

The civilizing developments of Greece, Egypt, and Palestine between the early second millennium BC and the first century BC constituted a gradual, determined restoration of the ancient civilizations. But the Roman conquests, which reached Judaea in 68 BC under general Pompeii, subjected the entire affected territories to a second barbarian conquest, the dissolute spirit of which resulted in the sacking of Rome by The Visigoths and the Huns in the fourth century AD. Yet the engineering feats of the Romans initiated a development that reached its climax only in the twentieth century. When Christianity was declared the official religion of the Holy Roman Empire by the Emperor Constantine, the Catholic cult of the Holy Virgin ensured that European culture gradually reverted back to its matriarchal moorings. But the development of commerce in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries resulted in the Protestant Reformation of the fourteenth century, and in the rise of the nation-state, which increased the spirit of competition to the point where the Industrial Revolution brought about the modern economic age.

It may be seen, therefore, that the developments of history are by no means predictable: positive developments typically emerge from violent beginnings, and promising beginnings typically deteriorate into violent endings. The balance achieved over tens of thousands of years, over which the essential human condition crystallized out of the customs and ceremonies of ancient settlements, will not be easily restored. And one thing is certain: human nature is not amenable to any superficial political correctness requiring consideration for the spirit of a vernacular consumer society requiring that racial allegiance, class consciousness, gender prejudice, solidarity with own age-groups, national customs and ceremonies, religious preferences, and other functions of geographical and cultural conditioning be summarily denounced as aberrations, and abjured in the interests of advancing the cause of the weak against that of the strong. The market economy has constituted the only known prophylactic for such propensities of the human spirit, which translated in its absence into corruption and crime. Decoupled from the mechanism of the interaction between supply and demand, such political mischief will produce disastrous outcomes. It is self-evident that the entire charade originated as an attempt to cover up a ground-swell of criminality beneath a pretence at ethical superiority by which a noxious agenda could be advanced.

A brief survey of the current South African situation will illustrate the implications entailed in the principles listed above. The 14 December 2008 issue of City Press reveals that nothing is as it seems in national affairs, and still less as it should be.

President Thabo Mbeki, who once, when pressed to present a definitive statement of his convictions, replied: “Just call me a Thatcherite” – out of desperation to focus attention on economic issues – cannot in good faith be compared with Mr. Jacob Zuma without incurring the error of logic known as ‘comparing apples with oranges’. Yet every instance of support for Mr Mbeki, from his commission of inquiry into the Scorpions to the Ginwala inquiry into the fitness of advocate Vusi Pikoli to hold office, was perversely transformed into support for a tendentious one-party hegemony, and support for the man who most deftly abuses the prevailing party-cronyism to his own advantage: Mr. Jacob Zuma.

The chief instrument in that strategy has been the presentation of those legal matters in the media. The essential nature of those issues were never clear, and it could never be discerned which of Mr. Zuma or Mr. Mbeki was charged with misconduct, or for what reasons. It was therefore never possible for observers to take a stand in the matter on a basis of principles of right conduct and of good governance. However, the outcome of all the polemics and media-driven controversies was preceded by developments following an inexorable pattern: the economically astute former president was discredited and disempowered, and the populist strategist with the street-fighter image is riding the crest of the wave into the highest office in the land.

The political editor of City Press, Makhudu Sefara, writes of Mr. Zuma as of a crusading knight lopping off the heads of his adversaries and the neutralizing the institutions represented by them, as if no thought is to be given to the needs of the country’s people and to the optimal political and economic courses to be taken in the present situation. Now that the matter is a fait accompli, it is revealed that advocate Pikoli was instrumental in the effort to expose corrupt dealings by Mr. Zuma, which could include the taking of bribes in the Arms Deal. Now that president Motlanthe has retrenched advocate Pikoli, it is revealed that ‘”This is a political decision which should be respected as such. Pikoli’s dismissal has nothing to do with his competence. He is a bright man.” (Kevin Malunga, law lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand). Now that Mr. Nathi Mthetwa has been widely endorsed for his smart thinking on fighting organized crime, it is revealed that the idea of his appointment was ‘to have the pro-Mbeki Brigitte Mbandla headed for the political scrap-heap’.

The matter of COPE is already subjected to ambiguities of the kind characterizing the developments mentioned above. Mr. Mbazimba Shilowa makes intelligent and progressive statements, while remaining sensitive to the realities confronting the disadvantaged, such as the following:

‘Among other things we will grow the productive base of our economy, building and harnessing knowledge-based and services-oriented sectors and, critically, ensure that this results in many millions of South Africans being given quality and sustainable jobs.’

‘We will reshape the National Economic Development and Labour Council to give the unemployed a voice. ‘

‘We will promote growth driven by a clear industrial policy that creates competitive space for new industries, favours beneficiation of our minerals and labour-creating manufacturing sectors, and ensures a market for intermediate goods.’

‘On a macro-economic level we will advocate a competitive exchange rate, state intervention, including lower interest rates at development finance institutions to promote private capital formation and vice versa, and will use capital controls as part of our anti-inflation armoury. On a micro-economic level we will strengthen the state’s capability for targeted intervention and ensure access to low-cost inputs.’

‘COPE wishes to align Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment with entrepreneurship, with tackling intra-race tensions along class lines, and perceptions of political and economic advantages arising from ethnicity.’

However, the American neo-liberal rhetoric of ‘hope and change’ has also surfaced in COPE’s sloganeering. Perhaps links with that powerful movement will provide answers to the rising belligerence of African communism in the decade when China and Russia turned decisively to the market economy. Yet perhaps it will prove to be merely a link to the rise of Islam. To read Ali Mazrui’s column is to become aware of a growing confidence in the bid for Muslim world domination. It is hoped that the USA will have its first Muslim president by 2050. Yet why should that hope represent anything less incongruous than the hope of a Calvinist, Anglo-Saxon president in Iran by 2050? There is no need to hope that globalization could work if it is to be merely a bid to subject the world’s variegated cultures to a single barbarous one, namely the one that would present criminals with optimal opportunities for pillage.

It seems that all proportion has been lost in current journalism. Lindelwa Nojekwa is encouraged to enthuse over her ability to identify socio-economic rights such as

‘The right to an environment that is not harmful to health or well-being; the right of access to adequate housing; the right of access to health care services; sufficient food and water; social security and the right to education’

Without paying any attention at all to the means whereby such rights will be paid for. That cultivates an impression that matters can be addressed merely by formulating the language of legislation correctly, as if by the wave of a magic wand. Yet the developed countries have already experimented with the concept of the welfare state, and found it exorbitant to the point of unworkability. The media have a duty to state that fact for the public’s information, but fail to do so.

The political notion of engineering a just world, that is, an intelligent world, is not a foolish one. It is the only notion with any chance of working at all. Therefore the media must be deployed as a means by which to inform people, not a means by which to deceive them in the interests of potentates who seek to exploit their lack of efficient information. Bring on the market economy.

‘Diamonds are a girl’s best friend’

The Mafia may now be defined as the dominant element in the international security services, which, in collusion with the global mass media, prosecutes a hidden agenda calculated to establish a universal communist state disguised as a liberal democracy invoking Divine Authority in declaring the advent of a millennium of hope and change. The dynamics prosecuting the agenda depend on the applications of medical science deployed by the security services in matters of national concern and international diplomacy. That agenda’s success in subverting democracy, Christianity, and the market economy in the interests of communism, Islam, and criminal cartel economics, demonstrates that the provisions of rule of law have been recast for the purpose of facilitating that objective. Concealed, malign manipulators of the media grossly abuse the important concept of the need for a separation between the judiciary and the executive in order to continue corrupting legislation, for the purpose of advancing the agenda bringing Global Organized Crime to world domination.

The most crucial effect thus achieved is that by which the rogue element impelling the agenda persuades societies to mistake the violent effects of absolute power for the work of the progressive constituency represented by the conservative Anglo-Saxon countries of the Christian West. The perverted perceptions, opinions, and sympathies generated and sustained by the global mass media to that effect ensure the success of the war thus waged upon the human race.

The situation in Zimbabwe functions as a barometer for the effects of terror, although journalists would sooner quit their jobs than suggest that to the public – since little work can be found other than that whereby Robert Mugabe is reviled, and the effects of his rule are linked by insinuation to conservative democracy. Zimbabweans are attacked by cholera. Filthy, unhygienic conditions at conduits of open water are shown to infect every stricken community. The media do not even need to mention their chief insinuation, since their homework was well done throughout the past decade – namely that during all those years when the media reviled Mugabe, he sat on his hands instead of upgrading the provision of water to his people. The truth is, however, that he travelled to every city of the world in a desperate effort to establish a counter-offensive against his ruthless and murderous enemies – who will stop at nothing to get their dirty paws on Zimbabwe’s diamonds.

The international community is given to believe that nothing could be more preposterous than to link the bloody revolution that is now stoked in South Africa through gross abuse of the rule of law, namely the court order preventing COPE from contesting the election, to the biological warfare waged upon Zimbabwe by those who covet its diamonds. Awake South Africans know better. Behind news inserts covering the two events they can clearly discern the voice of the common enemy exhorting his apparatchiki on the ground, saying: “Murder them with cholera, murder them with rule of law, murder them with HIV-Aids, motor-car accidents, savage slaughter – but get your hands on those diamonds and bring them to me!”

That is the crude truth of it. Those who wield the real power behind media appearances have degenerated to a level of such barbarity that they have long ago lost all sense of proportion along with their sanity. They would as little flinch at the prospect of blasting a hundred citizens of Mumbai to death with massive bombs than they would flinch before any other atrocity deemed necessary to confiscate wealth wherever they find it. They prosecute a bid for unconditional world domination, and they have no intention of being stopped.

But sleepy South Africans are not as fortunate as those who enjoy access to efficient information. Communists and Bishop Tutu are prone to being swept up in propaganda campaigning for female rights, houses falling apart as soon as they are built, dirty water or lack of water, a thousand gripes keeping members of labour unions occupied in every conceivable mode other than that entailing a good day’s work at the factory, and so on. By exaggerating side-shows of that nature out of all proportion, the rogue element in the security services is able to prevent clear thinking on matters of cardinal importance. It persuades opinion-makers that those matters take precedence over the need to secure access to, and effective ownership of, the region’s means of livelihood – a need resulting from the necessity of securing national sovereignty through successful implementation and maintenance of the regional strategy regarding the export of mineral resources and commodities. As oil constitutes the means of livelihood for Iran, and natural gas the means of livelihood for Russia – diamonds, gold, platinum, and other strategic mineral resources constitute the means of livelihood for southern Africa.

Of course clean drinking water is of absolutely cardinal importance to the survival of any population. Of course it would benefit a woman nothing to have even a thousand diamonds if she is to be bludgeoned to death by some murderous ghoul. Still, without its oil Iran is nothing; without its natural gas Russia is lost. And without its diamonds Zimbabwe has absolutely no hope of surviving the assault by its concealed national enemy. Robert Mugabe is no fool: he has seen what happened to other African countries once the murderous blood diamond cartels got a hold of them. And the world never knew of the atrocities, because the blood diamond cartels controlled the mass media. The truth is that southern Africa’s diamond deposits probably constitute some three or four trillion rand in revenue when calculated over the coming two decades in terms of continual mining production. The region cannot hope to engage in economic development if its sources of wealth are to be pillaged by its worst enemy.

The force considered here has been instrumental in the charade generated around the American presidential elections, which has manoeuvred Americans into a near-desperate situation: their president has been overwhelmingly elected on the basis of concepts that in sober times would strike Americans as deriving from the utter limits of folly. The global economic melt-down caused by the blow-out of the US current-account deficit during the final decade of the export-led phase of the globalization of trade has provided the gigantically irresponsible constituency determining the direction taken by affairs with all the ammunition that it could want to blast the USA out of contention from within the safety of its own trusted institutions.

It is perfectly obvious to observers tasked with divining the deception behind media interpretations of affairs that the chief driver behind contemporary world history is a British force. A brief analysis of current propaganda directed against Russia will clarify what is meant. Consider the following passage from page 18 of the special report on Russia in the November 29^th issue of The Economist:

‘Since Russia’s nationalism defines itself in relation to America and the West, much will depend on American diplomacy. Mr. Gidar argues that offering NATO membership to Ukraine or Georgia would be a gift to Russian nationalists. “This is not a return to the cold war. It is much more dangerous. With the Soviet Union everything was more or less clear and predictable. Both sides got used to each other and found a way of talking to each other. Both sides won in the Second World War and were confident and not hysterical. Now we are dealing with a country that has suffered a loss of empire. And a significant part of the Russian elite feels the time has come to fight back.”

In the case of the British criminals who abused colonialism over the past century, the disgruntled party was likewise elite. Having gorged themsleves upon the most awe-inspiring treasure-troves of the world’s wealth, and having created the facility of offshore tax-havens to maximise that wealth – and having corrupted the Swiss banking system through dynamics involving the exporting of diamonds to Switzerland, those criminals perceived a way to insinuate themselves into collusion with their Third World victims, having posted great successes in blaming Britain for their own atrocities through their immensely successful global mass media. Upon returning to Britain, they found the repentant mood of their erstwhile British principals too much to stomach, and resolved to avenge themselves upon their nominal mother country out of opprobrium with its attempts at establishing a code of decency in foreign relations. Having achieved spectacular success in that respect in the process by which the Irish troubles were brought to an end, they perceived potential for a covert bid to achieve world domination. Their first move was a South African regime change.

The wise council offered by that British force to the USA in the pages of The Economist applies to itself, as much as, if not more than, to Russia, the country denounced by it for its nationalism, the power loathed more than any other by the constituency which plundered all countries on strength of a license to colonize, a process that corrupted it to the uttermost extreme. That covert criminal British force is now privileged to destroy also the USA, which has been the major stumbling block in its covert bid for world domination.

Since Russia cannot be tackled in any way remotely resembling the strategy deployed against weak and dirt-poor Zimbabwe, some sort of collusion with Russia against America will probably prove optimal from the point of view of the robber barons in their capacity as Divine Authority. Since ownership of the resources of Gazprom and Rosneft would constitute their ultimate goal, and not any concern for a resolution of the conflict for which they are responsible more than any other party, a strategy that could be conveniently deployed in the pages of The Economist would be as close to ideal as can be presently envisaged.

Good experience in engineering an invasion of South Africa by Zimbabwean refugees will serve as preparation for efforts to offer opportunities to the Chinese proletariat for an invasion of the vast Russian steppes. However, working with communist governments will present the added difficulty of having to apply the big stick to the USA in getting it to respond to the dangling carrot of a military show-down with Russia – an adventure that could be sold to a president Obama challenged to prove the validity of the overwhelming election vote in his favour – but which could at the last moment go horribly wrong, achieving the converse outcome, by which world domination could nevertheless be ensured for the manipulators. All will depend on how possession of cardinal strategic resources or military potentialities such as the US space program could be managed behind great flaws of hysteria and jealousy billowing up from media reportage on side-shows invented to beguile the public for the purpose.

A close eye will have to be kept on who is buying whom on the cheap off the pile of rubbish presently lying on the floor of the New York stock exchange. Even Warren Buffett can buy only so much, and the vultures have not converged all their powers into bringing about the fall of the American Dream for nothing. Even more importantly, covert operators who buy the shares of Russian, Chinese, and Indian companies that seek to acquire American talent on the cheap must be monitored: although The Economist might continue to treat business as a purely economic matter, it would from now on be a mistake to presume that the competition does the same.

At this stage the comparatively innocent pleasantries thus far dealt with in this essay must be dispensed with for the purpose of turning to matters of an altogether more serious nature.

The criminal element may now have become corrupted to a sufficient extent to ensure an imminent return to universal primordial matriarchy.

Of course, the bludgeoning, terrorising, blackmailing, exterminating leadership of Global Organized Crime will scorn the prospect, knowing that it could wipe out nine-tenths of the world’s population if that is what it would take to prevail over crazed masses of murderous women. But that it nothing to the point. Nine-tenths of the survivors would under conditions of continually exacerbating barbarism necessarily be subjected to the tender mercies of the Primitive, such as universal human sacrifice, cannibalism, leprosy, and soul-shattering sexual initiation rites – in an ontology where the concept of fatherhood will feature as an old-wives’ tale from a bygone age, in which men were allegedly quaintly permitted to interfere with female prerogatives. The societal idioms of domesticity and coenobium will be reduced to the primordial ordinances of sexual anatomy and animal magnetism, which, in the absence of the regulatory customs of organized religion and recorded history will revert back to the paradigm that appointed the female praying mantis to the function of the representative of the Creatrix on Earth – a convention that was still observed by the Bushmen of the Kalahari desert when Sir Laurens van der Post studied their way of life.

For the race thus constituted, the only commerce with the gods who rule in their impenetrable fastnesses may be the experience of being snatched by agents emerging from military vehicles swooping like lightning out of the blue, and becoming the reluctant donor of a kidney or an eye, soon to be dismissed with a cotton wool patch to which to point when saying: ‘That’s where my kidney (or eye) used to be.”

The convention of the Sacred King deputizing over the seals by which a successful harvest is to be assured through correct propitiation of the goddess will be reinstated in due course of time. The King of the Growing Year will be eucharistically sacrificed at the winter solstice, and his twin, or rival, the King of the Dying Year, instated in his place until the eve of the summer solstice. The goddess of the hawthorn will subject the life of the tribe to a nameless terror where she will enforce a holy dread over all matters of a sexual nature, and will keep good order throughout her lands, haruspicating through her five familiars, the raven, serpent, sow, trout, and cat. How long the gods will continue in their mobile fastnesses to avoid contact with the Planet of the Apes, as they will tend to view the dispensation of mere mortals, is a moot point. All members of the wild tribes will feature only as repositories of precious vital organs for transplantation into the bodies of the gods, or as donors of fresh young bodies for old hearts whose original owners live on for generations, refusing to die to their great scientific knowledge, and to be re-subordinated to the powers that incarnated them in their present life on this planet at this moment in time.

Yet the mortals have recourse to the power of the spirit. They will empower their most beautiful and gifted boys and girls to ensnare young gods and goddesses with the magic potions of love and mystery, and will empower them to discourse impetuously with their elders for the cause of glorious mortality.

Thus the rule of the gods will come to an end, and the extraordinary opportunity represented by modernism may not arise for another forty thousand years, if it will ever arise again. Unless the rebelliousness and obduracy of the male heart could somehow be tempered, and the right attitude can be consistently maintained by which the experiment with a more just, more intelligent society could bring about a millennial mastery of the human source in the divine, so that the wild fluctuations of the soul will yield to a more knowing sense of being that any previously attainable.

The price to be paid for rifling the diamond deposits of the world’s most ancient race is higher than the robber barons realize. They would indiscriminately exterminate in order to work their way through the monetary wealth into which the gems will be transposed, to be squandered in pursuit of dubious objectives. But in the process they reveal a weakness: intolerance for world views that become all too plausible when the artificial conditions on which their narrow views depend would break down. Life cannot be reduced to any one world view, for times change rapidly, and conditions could be reversed with great speed. Absolute contempt for the essential human condition could under no circumstances rate as an intelligent attitude.

‘Diamonds are a girl’s best friend’ is a catchy phrase. But what does it really mean?

Drunk driving and the Mafia

It is difficult to determine whether or not Global Organized Crime is selling South Africa’s president, Kgalema Motlanthe, down the drain of history. But it is very likely to be the case. Mr. Motlanthe is made to feel hugely justified in denouncing advocate Vusi Pikoli, who has been lengthily abused by the national enemy in a disingenuous pretence that the presidents of democracies must necessarily behave apologetically whenever relatively junior officials disagree with their views on matters of national security.

Mr. Motlanthe is being dragged into the mire in which both the country’s former president and its potential future president must wallow as a result of the media’s failure to state the fact of the intimate involvement of the British-owned South African-based sub-continental resources sector in the politics and economics of Zimbabwe.

The Afrikaans commentator on legal matters, Pierre de Vos, is correct in warning that a dangerous precedent is being created by which the one-party communist state could overcome such checks and balances of the rule of law as must protect South Africa’s frail democracy.

As in all cases, without exception, Mr. Motlanthe is the victim of a pretence at being served with well-intentioned advice, in which the real motive has been betrayal from the onset. The media present the matter in accordance with instructions from a force ostensibly enjoying the highest possible credibility with the global progressive constituency, which Mr. Motlanthe represents, but which in truth advances the hidden agenda of Global Organized Crime. The purpose behind the move is to denude the office of the South African president of credibility: the very same force responsible for the great conviction with which Mr. Motlanthe stated his strong disagreement with advocate Pikoli’s views will broadcast highly authoritative denunciations of that action in terms of provisions directing damning indictments at Mr. Motlanthe’s decision to adopt the suggested strategy. All efforts will be calculated to show that he has cause to cover up dirty secrets with respect to the earlier behavior of Mr. Mbeki, Mr. Zuma, and himself in the matter of Commissioner Selebi and his relations with the Mafia – a matter which goes to the heart of international affairs, but is being fanatically focused on South African internal affairs in media reportage for the purpose of deceiving the public with respect to the nature, scope, and magnitude of the issue.

The dirty trick involved is a pretence directed at the influential white constituency to the effect that the nasty ANC communists are brought low in the interests of bringing COPE to power. But that implied promise could disappear like mist before the morning sun when the chips are down, and matters continue to inexorably deteriorate in accordance with the global criminal agenda by which communism is sneaked in through the back door, and on the back of Liberal Democracy – in the USA as elsewhere in the world. In South Africa, the Mafia represents the highest legal authority, and all leaders elected by democratic means are criminals. That is why the Mafia arranged that the present watch of the office of Chief of Interpol should be manned by a South African.

Should Mr. De Vos ever be confronted with the reality regarding the legal system in which he and other right-thinking citizens invest their trust, he would recoil in horror, and would despair of ever seeing justice prevail in South Africa. The withholding of the implications of that reality from the public by the mass media constitutes the gravest crime ever committed against humanity, for the state of affairs represents the rule, not the exception, not only in South Africa, but in the majority of countries around the globe. Even as the mindless slogan, ‘Change is good!’, is shouted and displayed everywhere, all political and economic change wrests power and security from democracies and from their government leaders and their economic achievers, and cedes those privileges to the communists, Muslims, and leadership of a cartel capitalist model opposed to the Western world view.

Concealed, malign manipulators of the media continue to manage Mr. Jacob Zuma in terms of an agenda ensuring one-party communist hegemony throughout the mineral-rich sub-continent: Namibia is scarcely less blessed with strategic resources than is Zimbabwe. President Sam Nujoma has been ruling there for a full decade – a very convenient punch-bag for precisely the kind of invective by which the global mass media could condemn Africa as a perfect cover whenever a heist of unexampled magnitude is to be pulled off. That is why Mr. Zuma is drumming up support for the ANC in Namibia: SADC must refuse to acknowledge COPE, in the event of that party posing a significant threat to the ANC in the coming general election. Yet that will hardly deter the international resources sector from mounting a ‘people’s revolution’ against Mr. Nujoma, so that the Namibian government will have almost no control over its affairs when the knock-out punch is delivered for the fraud of the century.

Government projects are easily aborted under false pretences. For example, the South African Minister of Housing, Me. Sisulu, does all that she can under the most difficult circumstances imaginable to deliver houses to the nation in accordance with a well-organized schedule comprising the names of the most deserving candidates – only to find unruly mobs who have been agitated to a state of anarchy by the national enemy take possession of the houses en masse, thus jeopardizing the social contract by which others were scheduled to move into the houses in accordance with crucial elements of their current empowerment status, such as recent promotion at their place of work and other factors by which their career development could be cemented and secured through the facility of home ownership. In reporting on the matter, the media utterly forget that housing delivery cannot, by definition, satisfy all involved at once – yet the government and its capable minister bear the blame for all trouble arising from media violence in that regard. Because crowds do not have to think for themselves, but instead are free to demand from the government whatever seems most expedient, on strength of their membership of the communist party or of labour unions, the national enemy is free to comprehensively deceive the international community on the quality of South African democracy.

Please do not expect the media to offer that point of view to the public – the media need to be obsequious before their paymasters: they must show that democratically elected government leaders are criminals, and that criminals represent Divine Authority.

Neither COPE, the DA, Inkhata, the Freedom Front, nor the UDM yet promises to produce a spokesperson capable of galvanizing the nation into awareness of the urgent need to unite in the formation of a party to the right of the ANC, in the interests of positioning the country favourably for multi-party democracy in terms of a labour party and a conservative party. The country’s leaders seem terrified at the thought of confronting voters with the suggestion that anything other than communism could possibly offer an alternative policy with which to approach the future. Yet not a single cent of additional capital production will be generated out of the masses for their economic development until they realize that nothing can save them except intelligent application of economic and scientific knoweldge – an outcome that cannot be bought at the altar of demand, but that can be earned only through a culture by the tenets of which individuals learn as if their lives depended upon it. All successful nations needed at some point in history to brace themselves and shoulder that responsibility. Success through communism has never yet been seen on Earth. Why should South Africa prove the exception to the rule? The truth is that communism favours Africa’s enemies, and no other party.

Mr. Zuma is moved to excuse the ANC on grounds that after ten years people become disenchanted with their leaders because their expectations are ill met. But Mr. Zuma should know that power corrupts, and that therefore the best defence for any society against the corruption of power is an opposition party willing and able to take up the responsibilities of governance with a clean slate and with the energy that comes with confrontation by the sense of a big job to be done. Mr. Zuma does his country no favour by drumming up support for the incumbent governing party while his neighbour Robert Mugabe is denounced for holding on to power in the teeth of an assault on his country’s means of livelihood. The notion of ‘regime change’, which has resulted in so much slaughter and death in Africa, would not have been relevant at all, had the concept of multi-party democracy been fundamental to the continent’s politics. Under present conditions, only bloody civil war or equally destructive forms of violent revolution can bring a needed change of leadership. The pressure sustained by an anonymous national enemy through the machinations of communist apparatchiki destroys all hope of efficient governance.

Covert dynamics prosecuting the diabolical agenda to which government leaders are subjected work similarly in the case of the public: all forms of cultural intercourse are denied to citizens who are too intelligent to be lied to. Although they may feel that those whom they engage in conversation are altogether harmless, such citizens are constantly reminded by means of road traffic advertising campaigns that their privacy is hourly violated by agents who monitor them through ICT surveillence equipment in order to manipulate and coerce their behavior. They gradually learn that drunken driving serves as a metaphor for those who talk too much about their observations on contradictory and idiotic media statements with respect to current national affairs. In accordance with the requirements of a rapacious criminal cartel economic culture, such well-informed citizens are expected to live like mute hermits among the small number of relatives and acquaintances granted them, as if they were unusually obtuse – thus to ensure uninterrupted sway for the least informed among those, who must adamantly hold the floor where they unwittingly serve as the mouthpieces by which the Mafia’s rude hidden agenda is prosecuted through the telemetric applications of medical science deployed by the security services.

Presumably the Mafia has achieved such high levels of success in turning people into stereo-types and caricatures: abject old soaks, sleazy drudges, and pot-heads – that drunken driving is a perfectly apt metaphor by which to warn blabbermouths that their time could be up. Again, the drunken debauchees at whom units of sensitive information is hollered in smoked-up hovels in the small hours of the night, over barbarous sounds mistaken for music, could scarcely constitute security breaches – yet the Mafia worries that those who listen in on unprotected ICT lines would get snippets of information by which its position on various crimes against the national order could be determined.

As a result, the Mafia feels justified in micro-managing every conversation in which significant content on current affairs may be exchanged, and to threaten the more intelligent conversationalists involved with dire consequences from the law, and even with the loss of life and limb in punishment for expressing morally intelligent criticism that could compromise the Mafia’s efforts to corrupt the society upon which it parasites.

I grew up in a South Africa reeling under the drug waves of the ‘sixties and ‘seventies. During the eighties, every young house maker found an unmarried buddy seconded to his household, who had to arrive at his house on every day of the year with a bag of marijuana and a bottle of whisky, or a six-pack of beer and a bottle of wine. Thus it was ensured that no proper education could take place in moral and cultural terms – that children would instead be accustomed to drunken, dissolute adults too closely engaged in a regime of sexual competition threatening the family’s security to pay quality attention to them. The children would flee from the smoke-filled rooms where the adults conducted their adamant feuds, and could be easily debauched by neighbouring children – and, particularly in cases where young parents were exceptional or their families were politically prominent, the parents could be blamed for the deviant sexual patterns encouraged by such means.

The life-style thus enforced stood in violent contrast to the puritan Calvinism of my background, and the cess-pool of permissiveness and Marxist rhetoric that accompanied it diametrically opposed the nationalist instincts bequeathed to me by my family. But the way of life was ruthlessly enforced despite all protest, relegating the prospect of realizing my obsessively held childhood aspirations to the status of a mere inappropriate dream.

However, I never saw a single advertisement warning against drunk driving during those years, when people got behind the wheels of cars with opened bottles of liquor in their hands. Now that I do not even imbibe any alcohol at all, refuse to inhale smoke of any kind, and have maintained an uncompromisingly celibate lifestyle for a decade, I am confronted with a drunk driving advertisement as soon as I switch on the television to watch the news. It did not take long to work out that morally intelligent social criticism serves as a metaphor for drunk driving in the campaign, and that it is suggested that the same horrific outcome will follow upon both courses of action: a devastating car crash that could result in the amputation of limbs or loss of life.

Yet when anything becomes known with regard to the murderous totalitarian regime conducted against the South African citizenry by the Mafia, under a false pretence at a Liberal Democracy flourishing under the provisions of the most advanced constitution in the world, the international community must be held to ransom with mass hysteria over the undying achievements of the South African athletes at the Beijing Paralympics. Only the Mafia qualifies for absolution for abuses, not its victims.

The terrible wrongness of a strategy of fundamental, comprehensive deception to be practised on a national and even global scale can be seen when viewing advertisements such as the one in which young, aspiring Africans boast that careers in the media do not affect merely their work, but their lives – while the Mafia does not give a fig for anybody’s life, and maims and murders to its heart’s content, happy in the knowledge that the public can never learn of the dirty secrets through which criminals assail it on every normal work day.

The matter of female empowerment is plagued by the same diabolical insistence on violent reactions where well-reasoned arguments are required to address burning issues. Women can be empowered through violence, because violence countenances no answers. But that can result only in an even more violent counter-revolution. Violence begets violence. What is needed is intelligent application of best practise as derived from the world’s most successful countries, and morally intelligent efforts to increase the benchmarks. The war between the police and organized crime has already resulted in a promise to fight fire with fire. The war will soon spread to civilian life and the private sector. Thus a vicious downward spiral will prosecute a zero-sum game in which only the national enemy can win. Women and their children would lose in deepest consequence if their quest were allowed to degenerate to that level. So too would men.

It may therefore be argued without reservation that devout observance of Christian values would have prevented the political and economic evils presently besetting emerging countries such as South Africa. Nor would that have precluded a flourishing open market economy, whose history need not necessarily have paralleled that of the present USA at all, since its failure of the US financial sector by no means resulted from internal contradictions, but from the actions of those among its enemies who studiously and laboriously plotted its downfall.

It is both easy and pleasant to be an apologist for Christianity, democracy, and the market economy, because those three elements of civilization developed out of a long tradition of intense self-searching and intelligent discussion of shared experience. They did not simply arise as instinctive reactions to threats from stronger competition. But any culture can be attacked by an enemy who would be prepared to say: “Very good, the competition has its principles for success and its culture that must give currency to those principles. But we are free to secretly deconstruct those principles by means of a counter-culture formulated to overwhelm the status quo of their passive culture with the tenets and canons of an active culture.” Where political domination at all costs is the sole criterion, such strategizing is not obliged to take cognizance of the provisions of the Moral Law. However, in the long term, economic and religious factors become more and more decisive. And the culture that has done its homework with respect to things that really matter to human beings will eventually prevail.

I have no least doubt that, once the objectives behind the rules of the present game become generally known, the Christian West will continue to offer a very high quality of experience to those who have leisure and opportunity to reflect on the nature of things. The great danger lies in a brand of fanaticism that would barbarously disregard the requirements of human nature in the short-sighted hope of prevailing at every price, even if the essential human condition is to be debased in the process. That could result in desperate reactions. And in a world of Space Age science and technology, desperate reactions could produce extremely violent results.

It is important, therefore, that a new appreciation should be fostered for the virtues of the scientific method, in which violent enforcement of the will of one party upon that of another has no place, since the conduct of affairs requires rigorous observation and testing of statements rather than blind, angry hollering at the competition, as if its policies were necessarily worthless by comparison to those held by the hollering demagogues. Mr. Vavi’s angry denunciations of the opposition are driven by a national enemy that abuses the applications of medical science deployed by the security services in matters of national governance and international diplomacy. Under normal conditions, the formal economy represents an important discipline for application of the scientific method – one that is likewise rigorously tested against the results of observation and experience. The reason why I submit that “Dr. Blade Nzimande’s loquacious eloquence solemnly and elaborately misses the point” is that every debate is approached with a historicist presumption that reduces to claims such as: “We are communists, therefore we must be invincible!”, which can be easily followed by a further presumption: “The world is in a crisis of economic melt-down – therefore we need more communists!” The logic is circular and erroneous, because it disdains to evaluate itself against rigorous standards of veracity in the presentation of facts. The often-asked question, “How can the ANC be wrong?” is mired in disingenuousness, because it refuses to countenance an answer.

The dilemma presented by a lack of rigorous standards for discourse leaves Africans with a very severe disadvantage against their concealed enemy. The factors perpetuating the disadvantage must be eradicated as soon as possible. And that will require that Africans rise to the challenge of out-learning the other nations of the world, and following up with earth-shattering proofs of their restored ingenuity through sustained world-beating performance.

Let us dare to contemplate the wonder of that event.

Money and Power

Many think that money and power are inseparable, that those concepts represent the two sides of a single coin. I will show in this essay that although that presumption contains an element of truth, it definitely does not correspond to the view uncritically accepted by those who rely upon received opinion for their interpretations of experience. More importantly, I will show that, as applicable to societies beleaguered by current covert, oppressive orders of power making war on democratic governments, through media violence, mass action, and communism, money represents a much more useful and positive force than does power – that money is the fruit of civilization, whereas power is the mark of the beast.

The distinction between open market economics and cartel economics must be clearly drawn in order to put the matter in perspective.

The American brand of free enterprise, which is today everywhere under attack, constitutes the frontier of human advancement; the crisis in which it finds itself confronts the human race with its gravest threat in a century. Economic liberalism, the stronghold of conservatives, is reviled, and political liberalism, the stronghold of communists, touted in its place. As the world watches, the $14 trillion United States economy is comprehensively nationalized. Had a strong conservative movement prevailed, the prospect of rapid privatisation to follow the attainment of stability would have been certain. But in the present climate of political revolution and mass hysteria, that prospect is mired in difficulty.

However, no sooner has a messiah been elected to the White House on a mandate to bring hope and change to the world’s protector, than the massive Mumbai bombs shattered the optimistic mood upon which he was swept to power. That will have a sobering effect on current views with respect to the virtues of freedom: some seek freedom to love and to learn; others seek it to pillage and to oppress. How can the civilized be protected from the barbarous, except through a stoic approach to governing the social order?

In southern Africa, the conservative president Mbeki was deposed by populists in a fit of petulance induced by media-driven misunderstandings. President Mugabe continues under siege from the region’s British-owned, South African-based resources sector, which sustains a media smear-campaign pretending that the atrocities perpetrated upon Zimbabwe derive from Mr. Mugabe’s resilience, rather than from their own murderous coveting of the country’s strategic minerals. However, those two leaders may have done enough to prevent the new brand of international communism, as driven by covert British criminal elements since Russia and China lost interest, from sweeping throughout Africa and rendering its information-starved populations prone to the rapine and murder by which pirates in the global resources sector intend to rifle their strategic minerals with the able assistance of criminals who have long abused colonialism.

The realization is slowly dawning on South Africans that the future out of which they have been cheated by communism may be regained by means of the new party, Congress of the People (COPE). Messrs. Lekota and Shilowa make no secret of their closer alliance to Mr. Mbeki than to anarchists who would slash and burn whenever their demands cannot be immediately met.

One of the most serious threats confronting the subcontinent is the strategic use to which the communism driven by British criminal elements has put the demand for a quota system of 50% representation for women in government. Many international observers will be awe-struck at the audacity of Africa’s enemies in weakening the quality of its governance by forcing through a tendentious expedient of such staggering ineptitude. The mileage gained by the global mass media with regard to the alleged stupidity of the average African seems to have done wonders to create acceptance for that, the most transparent trick among many that could be rated as being of diabolical, if not genocidal, intent. The presumption driving the move is that every woman is dying to become a community leader rather than to raise a family, just as the presumption driving the move to absolve the insane butchers of covert fascism from guilt is that every paraplegic pines after the opportunity to do sport rather than to pursue a career as perhaps a lawyer or doctor.

That president Mbeki had done all that he could to empower women did not prevent the devils who engineered his deposition from taking advantage of that and many other good things that he did for the country – although he would hardly have insisted that a 50% quota system override good judgment in the matter of female representation in government. Imagine how an insistence on 50% female representation in the economy would have been met – informed people know the terrible responsibilities borne by business leaders; they would hardly risk failure in the interests of a political correctness enforced by the national enemy.

Such matters serve to sharpen the distinction between the open market model of capitalism and the cartel model.

It must be stated without reservation that the present temporary failure of the market economy cannot in a rational world be dissociated from the constant battle that it has fought in the global arena against a barbarous opposition representing perhaps a hundred-to-one majority of economically ignorant adversaries clamouring for its demise. In that regard America’s achievement of representing 30% of the global economy testifies to the enormous power of the market economy. Nor can it be responsibly denied that the criminal element has comprised the chief impetus behind that clamouring for its demise. Political oppression is inevitable in a cartel economic system: the feudal fiefdoms constituting its domains are governed on the basis of command and control – a characteristic shared with communism, crime syndicates, and totalitarian regimes languishing in fear and loathing. Cartels must necessarily feel deeply threatened by the modern concept of the open market. It follows, therfore, that the market economy of the maximization of shareholder value through private enterprise has never yet had a fair chance to prove itself: its actions have at all times been forced by a competition opposed to conditions characterized by access to efficient information and by fair competition in the market. That forcing of its actions is chiefly responsible for the errant ways into which it has often been driven.

The cardinal point that I have sought to make in the various ports of this blog is that the cases of African government leaders are essentially the same: their actions seem all the more vicious for the fact of a covert assault upon their every move from a powerful concealed global adversary. And their reputations in the international community fare no better than that presently reserved for American capitalism. The immense divide between the sophisticated mechanisms of the American financial sector and the crude amenities accessible to the leaders of poor African countries has enabled the common enemy to erect divisive barriers with respect to similarities between the two matters in the perceptions of the international community. Yet the failure of the two parties in their respective responsibilities results from essentially the same source.

Special observers and facilitators of good governance in developing countries know precisely how their government leaders are brought low through media violence, for they are themselves constantly prevailed upon by covert criminal elements seeking to seduce them with sexually deviant behavior, with alcohol abuse or substance abuse, and with business opportunities loaded to result in scandal or loss for them. No associate of theirs will be free from telemetric manipulation by the concealed national enemy. On one day an associate will uncharacteristically feel called upon to drink himself into the grave, thus bringing notoriety and ill repute over the observer or facilitator involved. On the next day he will experience an unaccountable urge to surf the world-wide web for pornographic sites – for the same purpose.

Such observers and facilitators know also that their relatives and friends are subjected to constant torture through pain and threatened humiliation, which reduce them to mere shadows of their real selves, and sometimes lead to unavoidable damage and loss in their personal lives. Moreover, they constantly endure the obnoxious tone in which criminals conduct their business, and are daily inveigled into obtuse schemes calculated to subordinate them to the criminals who govern their lives through ICT surveillance techniques, interactive television, telemetric applications of medical science upon their persons, abuse of their relatives and associates in the hidden agenda prosecuted by such means, and malign manipulation of the media in an assault against Christianity and democracy. It takes no wild leap of imagination to see such devices transposed upon government leaders, who are constantly exposed to risk and danger in their dealings with local political opposition and with foreign countries. Nor does it take a wild leap of imagination to see such a criminal regime transposed upon the new, improved, liberal America that has just been rewarded with its own messiah.

People who appreciate the virtues of the market economy will have no part of suggestions that family concerns should take precedence in business matters over the maximization of shareholder value. They know that the rot sets in at that precise point, for unless the system itself protects the market participant from the temptation to sacrifice productivity in value creation to the psychological pressures of family dynamics, he cannot overcome that pressure through individual effort. Africans know the difference in the two approaches from the billions of dollars received from the Bill and Miranda Gates Foundation for the fight against HIV-Aids. Americans know the difference better than members of other countries – not least from the $45 billion of assistance for American higher education that Warren Buffett has bequeathed to them. The real benefits presented by paragons of other capitalist models to the societies that supported them compare lamentably to those achievements.

Nor can any power other than free market capitalism protect the world against the forces now poised to become ascendant.

Organized religion is helpless against the capabilities of fundamental, comprehensive deception offered by modern science and technology; so also are journalism and the broadcasting services. Governments receive their information at third hand from the security services and legal institutions regulating daily affairs in the Space Age information economy. The current political bias favours communism, which lies thinly disguised beneath a veneer of liberal democracy. The religious bias favours Islam, which offers far better opportunities for social engineering and regimentation than does Christianity, whose adherents have become spoiled by access to the efficient information required by capitalism and democracy. Finally, the economic bias favours the cartel system, which is amenable to coercion and the withholding of vital information from all who seek to become incorporated into the formal economy.

Generally, then, criminality is much better placed to succeed under present conditions than a revived form of the free market would be.

During the three intervening centuries between the Industrial Revolution and the present, the power of the human spirit has become dispersed over a wide field through the dynamics of the vernacular consumer society engendered by mass media communications. During mid-twentieth century, the sentimental, baby-speak tone of Walt Disney’s early cartoon films exercised a powerful influence over modern public communications. Governments sought to manage the behaviour of masses of people in the idiom thus established, even where the often morbid undertones of taxation regimes and war efforts rendered it unwise; the kind of society shaped by that influence gradually ossified into the present media system, where programs such as Oprah and Dr. Phil exercise enormous power through a manipulation of the basic human instinct to please others and to trust them implicitly.

But now the power of the human spirit has silently and secretly become concentrated into its most terrifying primordial aspect – and it has harnessed modern science and technology for the purpose of focusing itself into the sensibility of the isolated individual, by means of applications of medical science daily deployed by the international security services in obtaining socio-political effects through bio-genetics and other forms of operation on the human person.

It is now possible to send dreams to target subjects. But not mere dreams – rather, lived experiences: police officers complain of being haunted by vivid dreams, in which they commit the murders that they investigate. They do not simply go through the motions of the murder, they actually live the experience through a bio-genetic simulation of the murderer’s biological and psychological state, as isolated by medical means at the time of the murder. The dreamer feels his pulse rate increase to the point where his heart slams against his ribs. His breath chases as if he has just run up a steep hill. He wheezes in depraved dementia where he slams the victim in the midriff, sending him sprawling to the ground. He lifts a long axe above his head, foaming at the mouth and closing in upon his luckless victim. He plunges the axe into the victim’s chest where he lies on his back. Then he removes it, applying leverage with his foot against the victim’s chest. He prepares for the next sickening blow, and the next, and the next – until he sinks spent to the ground beside the mangled corpse, howling like a crazed wolf at the moon.

It is now possible to send dreams of bio-genetically enhanced sexual experiences with some particular person known to the dreamer that are so real that it is as if the sexual act had indeed taken place, and the dreamer can no longer resume his former relationship with the person involved as if it did not happen.

By such means major economic and political changes are brought about in a manner of which the public knows nothing whatsoever except that offered by films and television series far removed in spirit from the way that individuals comprising the public view their own lives.

Ultimately, it must be accepted that acts of terrorism such as suicide bombings cannot be realized without the assistance of such medical technologies. Let us be honest. Could you move yourself to strap TNT around your body, to board a bus, or walk into a crowded mall, and blow yourself to a thousand smithereens along with twenty other innocent people? No? But terrorists can do it, because Muslims are ‘crazy’? I just do not see that. I think that suicide bombers are far from isolated individuals driven to the Gates of Hell by some fanatic psychological compulsion induced by their genetic make-up.

That means that the security services are involved in terrorism. But they have been prevented from divulging any information in that regard, by the very technology through which the monstrous industry is perpetuated. The medical profession is involved. The legal system is involved. Governments are involved. But none is able to escape the power of those controlling the system.

That means that secrecy is the single most powerful force in the world, and has the capability to destroy society.

Companies are involved in acts of terrorism. Companies, with their satellites, their fleets of ships, trucks, and trains. With their armies of security personnel. Their executive agents. Their telecommunications networks. Their media interests. Their lawyers. And doctors.

Yet still secrecy cannot be overcome. The fragmentation engineered through barriers against perception that are erected between every level of society and every department of every institution cannot be overcome. The left hand cannot know what the right hand is doing. No message can reach the public in a manner sufficiently powerful to galvanize it into the realization of what is happening. Not for long enough to explain how the octopus lies embedded, with its tentacles reaching into every nook and cranny of the body politic, the social fabric, and the cultural idiom. Not accurately and comprehensively enough to overcome the avalanche of media violence that will distract the public with side-shows over which great flaws of envy, hysteria, and madness will be generated – until all that was said on the topic has been forgotten, certain conservative politicians have been voted out of office, and all morbid mentioning of terrorism and similar topics has been comprehensively proscribed by the public media, the highest authority in the world.

That is no way to govern the world. Only madmen would do it.

The human race needs to straighten out the way that it communicates with itself. And if that is to happen, all notions that ‘my direct enemy can be deceived because I should be privileged to prevail over him, even if the entire world had to drown in the effects of injustice and barbarism’, must be overcome. But for that to happen, a responsible and morally intelligent global mass media is required. And that means the legal system has to be cleaned out. And the medical profession must be reformed.

In view of the above, it can be seen that the world requires perspective on the relative crimes involved in cases where greed for money is the driver and in cases where the lust for power is the driver. Greed is ultimately a likeable characteristic. People do not feel good when a guest staunchly declines everything that they offer by way of creature comforts or recreation. They warm to someone who gratefully accepts their offerings and openly enjoys it. Greed does not lead to the kind of murderousness under discussion here. The will to power is an altogether darker force than is greed. It is a perverse impulsion. If I ask you if you believe that I am powerful, you would say. ‘No, not particularly. Look at that fellow over there. He is going about his business, paying no attention to you at all.’ If however, you returned a year later, and I have everybody shackled in chains and labouring in the sweat of their countenances, you would be extremely impressed, and would say: ‘Yes, now you have certainly become a very powerful man. Nobody is allowed to ignore you any longer.’

Money is the product of civilization. Power is the mark of the beast. (And please do not say that I insinuate that Mr. Mandela is ‘a beast’; I do nothing of the kind. And I do not insinuate.) But those who control the media do not want the public to know that power is a dark, evil force. They want the public to think of everything in an upside-down, inside-out way that prevents all efficient knowledge from reaching it, so that they can profit the more handsomely from the proceeds of crime.

We need to distinguish between honest business and crime; the two matters are worlds apart.

Liberalism’s assault on Africa

Now that the American liberals have swept into power on a tidal wave of media violence peddling the rhetoric of ‘hope’ and ‘change’, stupid little South Africa has been invited to lecture the USA on the most intelligent political system with which to replace their earlier errant capitalism and conservatism: communism. Mr. Zwelenzima Vavi is encouraged to regale Washington with the fare normally reserved for the South African proletariat: the people standing and weeping before car-sized tin shacks burned down or swept away by floods on the open plains in every news bulletin of the year, complaining that the government elected to deliver them from oppression had failed them.

Mr. Vavi assures the media that the global proletariat will do everything in its power to address management wastages, particularly indulgent lifestyles, extravagant perks, and astronomical salaries and bonuses for CEOs. Those are laudable objectives: lacks and excesses could otherwise cause tragedy for worker families through retrenchments, and could exacerbate inefficiencies in an already struggling economy. However, the gratuitous propaganda into which Mr. Vavi’s statements are transformed by concealed, malign manipulators of the media give hundreds of millions of workers around the globe the impression that savings alone can produce the additional capital production required to safely bring emerging nations out of the dangerous situations in which they find themselves. They cannot. Only hard work in studying science, economics, and management theory, and intelligent application of that knoweldge in working with people, systems, and technologies can do that. Indeed, Cosatu and the SACP are responsible for far worse wastages than management, since they are forever singing and dancing in the streets, hollering slogans that advance the agenda of Africa’s enemies, instead of working efficiently at the factories producing livelihoods for South Africans.

But nobody is ever going to persuade Mr. Vavi and other communists of those truths. That points to a horrible deliberate inefficiency currently characterizing the work of security services and legal institutions responsible for the quality of media communications. Those most trusted by the South African Communist Party are responsible for the worst inefficiencies from which the poor suffer. Their objective is to prevent multi-party democracy: one-party hegemony suits them far better as a vehicle for oppression and corruption dressed up in the media as representations of Divine Authority.

The same situation applies in the matter of Zimbabwean cholera. Concealed, malign manipulators of the media, who have for generations oppressed Africans for the purpose of earning the highest possible profit margins from trading their strategic mineral resources, present the cholera epidemic intelligently enough up to a point – but then stoop to depravity in deceiving the public, by placing the blame for it on the scapegoat long targeted by them for the purpose of concealing the deleterious effects of their involvement in African politics. As they present communism to Africans as the most efficient political model with which to deal with their problems, so they blame the leaders of African governments for the vagaries and atrocities perpetrated by Africa’s most dangerous enemies – among which they are pre-eminent. And no-one is ever called upon to correct the effects of that dirty trick in the media.

It is perfectly natural for Africans to wish to supplement their anti-retroviral treatment with other medication, to lower the over-all costs of medication in treating the HIV-Aids pandemic – and to compete with the manufacturers of anti-retorvirals in the sickness industry. But Africa’s enemies attack traditional healers in their media out of fear that their profit margins will be reduced if Africans be given a choice in the treatments available to them. Representing the corrupt and criminal South African cartel economy, it is all too easy for them – perceived to be concerned over Africans’ well-being, they are free to employ arguments that reveal more about themselves than about the African traditional healers whom they hope to revile. Yet the international community, which does not suffer from HIV-Aids, does not know the motive behind the invective and libels, and uncritically believe the media – thus compounding the Afro-pessimism deployed as a weapon of war against those who suffer unto death from the cruellest disease ever seen on Earth.

Those who control the South African media have great fun in passing the blame for crime around between the police and the government, instead of fastening it on the criminals responsible for it. The sleepy public, which imagines that the law stands poised to protect it against any false move from criminals, cannot appreciate the reason why the government and the police are blamed for crime: criminals have taken control of the legal system, and thus the media. Although that fact is revealed through writing such as this, the criminals in control of the security services block any attempts to follow up with investigations into the matter. Thus inefficiency and oppression continue to characterize South African affairs, while criminals are the last ever to fear the prospect of a sleepless night.

The worst crimes perpetrated during the past week could be seen in the aftermath of the massive bombs that have ripped the heart out of the Mumbai body politic, and in the treatment meted out to Russians in the pages of The Economist, where the obnoxious work of meta-commentators supersede that of editorial staff, exacerbating the plight of ordinary Russians and their leaders alike. Remarkable similarities can be drawn between both the lifestyles of Russia and Africa, and the treatment meted out to their populations by manipulators of the media. The purpose behind it, as always, is to distract attention from gross corruption which cannot be blamed on governments, and from the motives of those responsible for horrific carnage – this time in India.

Under normal circumstances, it would prove a simple matter to cure communists of their ignorance. Concerned parties could supply them with the books of Sir Karl Popper, who took the trouble to trace the roots of error in the work of Karl Marx to Heraclitus, Plato, Artistotle, and Friederich Hegel, and to find the cures for those errors in the work of Schopenhauer, and to supply further cures of his own in terms of the scientific method. But in South Africa circumstances are very far from normal. Communists will never be privileged to receive efficient information; they will be strenuously held to the spartan regime imposed by demagogues fearing to lose trade union members to the rank and file of management – demagogues greatly inspired by the corrupt, criminal cartel economic leadership of the British-owned resources sector pillaging their mineral wealth, which permits no competition from any quarter in their own sphere of control, and influences communists to do the same in theirs. Mr. Vavi is invariably deceived by the impulse to be angry, which seems righteous in media propaganda, but prevents intelligent thinking. Dr. Nzimande is deceived by his own loquacious eloquence, which solemnly and elaborately misses the point.

During this past week I was thrown off balance by the severe tooth-ache of which I wrote in Liberal Democracy and the ‘Cage of Pain’. I was shouldered off two or three bases to which I had long tenaciously clung. But now I have begun to manage the tooth-ache. Remembering that someone mentioned, a week or so ago, that ‘some people have teeth growing from odd places’ made me realize that an effect is created as if a tooth is growing in my mouth from the position of the extracted left upper wisdom tooth. Possibly a small tooth has been present within my gums for some time, but had been prevented from growing by telemetric means, yet has been latterly stimulated to grow, making me suffer from the violent teething pains familiar to babies.

The violent tooth-ache is imputed into my sensibility by artificial means; of that I am certain. Travelling between Johannesburg and Bloemfontein with my sister, I was regaled with the joke of they guy who was too poor to buy food: whenever he asked the rich people to help him, because he could not eat, they would reply: ‘You have to force yourself, man, you have to force yourself’. The gist behind the joke has become clear to me now that the violent pain that I experience moves me to continue eating through an act of will, despite the pain.

I was also told of the marvellous new form of torture by which the patient complains of suffering horrible symptoms, yet the doctors can find no substantiation in his bodily indicators, and diagnose a severe case of hypochondria as a result. The patient merely thinks that the pain is real, but its cause is nowhere to be found.

One of the bases from which I was knocked was my long-held resolve not to yield on the matter of Zimbabwe’s diamonds. Yet I found myself calling upon my former BEE partner to hear if he could still run a gas plant with me. Then I was reminded that the gas plant business is inextricably tied to the MDC. My problem with the MDC is that those of its members who muscled in on my business entity in 2005 just sat back, watching rugby matches from VIP seats and drinking free beer, while an unknown force did everything for them. I cannot work in that way. I have long learned that whoever cannot be known or named for all intents and purposes represents the Mafia. And the Mafia will never let Africa retain a fair share of ownership and effective control over its own strategic mineral rights. Why should it? It is free to revert to terrorism whenever it meets with non-compliance.

Worse, Lord Brown of British Petroleum was summarily got rid of as if he were a mere junior clerk, much as president Thabo Mbeki was summarily got rid of some three years later – by the same people, and for the same reason: the Zimbabwean crisis for which Robert Mugabe is blamed in the media.

Another apparently trivial matter is that my Phillips kettle has finally stopped functioning. In Mafia-speak, that means that I have been a bad boy, and can expect to learn that Britain’s Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinborough, has presented with aggravated cancer of the prostate. As I say, these people have no consciences; they will do whatever it takes to obtain sole ownership of Zimbabwe’s diamonds, even if they have to sell the entire world down the drain of history.

The Mafia will have to do more than to make president Motlanthe say to me, at the funeral of Mr. Motlana – who was killed by the Mafia to punish me for refusing to work with it in stealing Zimbabwe’s diamonds – that I was always a great man whose vision extended beyond petty party political divisions. I shall continue to evade Land Rover, Caltex Techron, and Chevron, and shall hope to re-establish my bases with Toyota’s Hilux and Corolla.

The element of the Mafia involved in the matter of Zimbabwe constitutes by far the most ruthless of the many departments of Global Organized Crime with which I have had to deal. I cannot be persuaded that that particular department is above committing acts of terrorism and chemical warfare. I will not be moved until I read a sentence in a reputable Sunday newspaper to the effect that the British-owned South African cartel resources sector is intimately involved in the politics of Zimbabwe and that it has deceived the world by concealing that involvement for the purpose of blaming Robert Mugabe for its own crimes. And I want to hear it said on a television news bulletin too.

Nor would I have felt that way if only some small African country was being rifled and bludgeoned into oblivion by big criminal bullies. I have consistently repeated that the force involved presents a threat to the Christian West as a whole. I have related countless other matters to the Zimbabwean crisis, and I see more connections to it on every passing day. Yet the criminals involved occupy positions of such unchallengeable respectability in the vaunted British security services that they encounter no least difficulty in contradicting my statements. They are free to involve Prince Charles and Prime Minister Gordon Brown in their criminal schemes with impunity, because they know that the global mass media has the power to destroy any public figure, however great he may be, since the proceeds of crime and of African diamonds can continue indefinitely to pay for the madness and mass hysteria leveraged to pull off such crimes against humanity – while the crowing, snickering criminals behind the fraud present themsleves to the world as representatives of Divine Authority.

When the results of the American elections became known, the friend and assistant presently seconded to me asked: “So what do you think of Britain’s achievements as a world power?” My reaction was one of surprise. I thought: ‘Marvellous, but who could have thought that those are British achievements, since, admittedly, they could for the same price have been Russian, Chinese, Venezuelan, Iranian, and north Korean achievements?’ To introduce ‘hope’ and ‘change’ into America gratifies its enemies far more than its friends. The truth is that the ‘achievements’ boasted of through the mouths of ordinary citizens innocent of the dirty secrets behind media appearances are posted, not by Great Britain, but by those who have manipulated it into the invidious position of a country representing the perpetration of crimes against humanity, which are blamed in the global mass media on Arab nationals and Russian KGB agents.

America came very close to stooping to the level of that mendacity, when George W. Bush felt that nothing could be worse than to surrender to the vagaries of the secret enemy. But then the big stink that arose in the US media over ‘torture’ at Guantanamo Bay galvanized American decision-makers into the realisation that those Arab nationals were unable to produce evidence on the identities of the real drivers of the war against Christianity, and America resumed her role as the world’s conscience and as its watch-dog against crime and political abuse – at enormous cost to herself.

The steady rise of Venezuela and Iran as increasingly defiant and belligerent opponents of the Christian West, a movement prosecuted in collusion with those who control the global mass media, can never be dissociated from the hard work done by the vile traitors under discussion here, who obtain invincible positions in the global energy and resources sectors in exchange for their inexorable acts of terrorism and sedition. But American liberals can never know that the success of that drive against their national security is directly proportional to their buying into the propaganda against Robert Mugabe and Zimbabwe – unless they will learn from the media of the involvement of the British-owned South African resources sector in the politics of Zimbabwe.

Yet another leg of the successful propaganda war by which the USA is being brought low is that concerning Russia. Few things are more gratifying to Americans than to read deprecatory articles on Russia: generations of Americans have worked in security forces against Soviet opposition, and have fought in foreign wars where the real enemy was Soviet Russia. As the case was during the Vietnam war, when Chinese heroin was smuggled into the USA in the coffins of American soldiers, so anti-Russian propaganda works against the USA in deepest consequence. Firstly, because it keeps America focused on an adversary which is as much the victim of malignant propaganda as itself. Secondly, because it prevents America from negotiating good energy deals with Russia, to partner with it in south Asian oil pipelines, which could improve relations between Russia and Europe far more efficaciously than do nuclear threats, or to partner with it in Barendts Sea exploration for natural gas. And thirdly, because America is increasingly inveigled into a propaganda war that its unconscionable ultimate enemies seek to make it lose just when the moment comes when the USA will have to either see control of its vast defence capability and space exploration program pass into the hands of its concealed tormentors – or face defeat in a military showdown with the Asian bloc.

The Anglo-Saxon world must learn that there are traitors in its midst, who flourish on the provisions of Liberal Democracy, and who seek to avail themselves of obscene levels of power to the detriment of their countless victims. Those traitors are to be sought for among the rank and file of stewards and governors in former colonies to the British Empire characterised by prodigious deposits of strategic mineral resources and prodigiously unpopular leaders and governments.

A very brilliant former editor of The Economist, George Steiner, who became a famous literary critic, once wrote an essay on Sir Anthony Blunt, the art historian who specialized in the work of the French master Nicolas Poussin – in which Steiner told of how Sir Anthony would sip tea with the Queen in between covert communications with the KGB. He ended the essay with a resounding: “Damn the man!” Today’s Sir Anthonys deserve far more severe treatment than that, but receive nothing of the kind: they bask in glory as the representatives of Divine Authority, and as Masters of the Universe. Needless to say, George Steiner has disappeared from the scene. Soon after I devoured all his work, of which the best were Tolstoy or Dostoievsky, The Death of Tragedy, and Antigones, Mr. Steiner was invited to address an audience at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, where he famously said: ‘Go on, ask me any question’. After that all was silence.

In the latest issue of The Economist, the invisible enemy complains through the presses of its favourite mouthpiece that, although ‘the world as it was known’ has never changed in any way, certain tiresome commentators will continue to fear that it will do so this time. But the world in which George Steiner taught people how to read, whom to read, and why – namely because those authors offer the most intense immediacy of experience to be found on Earth – was not the same world as this one, in which everything that has ever made life worth living is snatched away from the millions who deserve to have it, and the brutish alone thrive in all their pettiness, injustice, and barbarism.

“Obey the rules of the road!”

In South Africa, a cursory glance at the media could create an impression of a most uncommon concern with traffic safety characterizing the daily lives of the country’s populations. Yet that would be a mistake: the concern is with keeping the secrets of those who govern behind the government and who manipulate perceptions, opinions, and sympathies behind appearances generated by the mass media. The exhortation to ‘obey the rules of the road’ refers to the duty of every South African to observe a code of silence on the ridiculous fare dished up during news bulletins and in the press, which do duty as explanations for the banalities and absurdities by means of which the country’s business is prosecuted. The unfortunate state of affairs is a function of the disingenuous nature of the true rulers behind the throne of every epoch since the Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902: stewards and governors of colonialism, who corrupted international relations between most significant countries of the world, and developed the culture of harmful equivocation typical of the global mass media today.

By preventing South Africans from interpreting their experience in terms of the quality of life resulting from changes forced upon them relative to the earlier status quo, and by feeding them an idiom of television soap opera through which all experience be criminalized for the benefit of Global Organized Crime, a precarious juggling act can be indefinitely sustained: a ‘bleeding-heart liberalism’ cloaks the vagaries of a totalitarian regime for which no vote has ever been cast by democratic means – in the interests of criminal elements long associated with the global resources sector and its clients, who require Africa’s strategic mineral resources for their expanding industrial economies. As it generates insurmountable problems for the governments of Thailand and Russia, so the power behind the ‘accidents of history’ generates insurmountable problems for the governments of South Africa, Zimbabwe, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

President Kgalema Motlanthe evidently appreciates the economic realities underpinning South Africa’s political troubles; Mr. Zuma fails to address them – therefore the powers that be have repeatedly warned that Mr. Motlanthe may govern for six months only, but that Mr. Zuma must be the long-term president. The dispossessed proletariat, as represented by Mr. Julius Malema and Dr. Blade Nzimande, believes that the arrangement will benefit it. But the legal profession believes differently: it seeks an opportunity to charge Mr. Zuma with corruption. The crisis of governance thus created will suit none but the concealed, malign manipulators who have engineered the situation for their own criminal purposes from the beginning.

That is the reality that may not be mentioned in daily conversation at work and at home – it will be deemed ‘bad driving’ in terms of the culture of obsequiousness enforced by means of interminable media campaigns and by means of an interminable series of bizarre legal precedents by which the national constitution is increasingly tailored to the needs of criminals. And of bad drivers examples must be made. The South African Paralympics team for the next Olympic Games could be assembled from the gross road ‘accidents’ to which those who know too much could be subjected – so that the entire world may be oppressed with the glorious victories of stupid little communist South Africa, to which the achievements of all superb athletes will be subordinated in the media, making them feel badly about their own talent and good health.

Mr. Mosiuoa Lekota’s incisive criticisms of the ANC’s failure to maintain law and order are making the whites sit up and take notice of COPE, the party aiming to unseat the ANC in the coming elections. But the constituency covertly championing Mr. Lekota through news bulletins presented under the banners of Caltex techron and Land Rover Discovery 3 abuses the political development through media violence: South Africa needs a conservative political party to complement the labour party that will be formed from the remnants of the ANC, thus finally to graduate to multiparty democracy after fifteen years of communist one-party hegemony. Yet Mr. Lekota is forever waving the Freedom Charter about, through the provisions of which so many atrocities have been perpetrated on Africans by abusers of colonialism and by communists alike.

Moreover, that concealed, malign constituency fails to acknowledge the involvement of the British-owned South African-based strategic mineral resources sector in the politics of Zimbabwe, and continues to sustain its attack on Robert Mugabe, whose battle is not with Morgan Thsvangirai, but with Africa’s most dangerous enemies – those who deny Africans any part of their own mineral wealth. The cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe cannot be separated from the attack on Mr. Mugabe, which has taken a thousand other forms in the past, and has included the attack on Mr. Mbeki, who sought to retain his alliance with Mr. Mugabe in the interests of addressing the real threat confronting Africa behind the endless propaganda claiming sub-human intelligence and sub-human moral integrity on behalf of Africans – for the purpose of denuding the continent of its means of livelihood.

The involvement of Africa’s enemies in the cholera epidemic reveals their capability to wield chemical warfare as a weapon of war against governments refusing to surrender their countries’ national mineral resources to the enemy. The following question could therefore rationally arise: ‘If a darkly enhanced force marshalling massive capital power, global reach, and strategic scientific capability elects to conceal the self-evident fact of its involvement in the political troubles of the country stricken with cholera – why should it not be directly concluded that the force considered was responsible not only for the cholera outbreak, but for the terrorist attack on Mumbai, and also for all other terrorist attacks for which no responsibility was assumed?’

However, irrationally, that question does not arise in the global mass media. Therefore it may be concluded that the power considered controls the global mass media. Which begs the next question: ‘For how many unexplained phenomena, and phenomena explained in a manner that could be rated only as hopelessly absurd, has the force here considered been responsible in the past, and for how many unexplained phenomena and destructive absurdities will it be responsible in the future?’ Finally, it must be asked: ‘In view of the foregoing, how can the aggregated damage of all events involved for human health and safety be assessed, so that a defence can be developed against it?’

It seems very important to me that pressure be placed on the constituency discussed, and that it be continually intensified, so that those responsible may feel it incumbent upon themselves to own the fact of their involvement in the politics of Zimbabwe, particularly those parts for which Robert Mugabe is invariably blamed. That is highly unlikely to happen, because the force behind the charade is the one that controls belief on Earth. It has persuaded the world that democratic governments are responsible for all maladies. Even the BBC advertisement in the latest issue of The Economist, which says: ‘You can’t suppress a powerful question’, and shows a microphone wrapped in with barbed wire, pretends that all would have been wonderful, had not the leaders of democratic governments been such rascals. It forces all entities to bow to its pressure – it does not experience any pressure itself. It supplies all reasons for all events on Earth, and uses its media to attack all those who disagree, until they agree. It cannot be possible that it be prevailed upon to confess involvement where the blame sits so prettily on the scapegoat laboriously created for the purpose – because, strictly speaking, that concealed power does not exist. It has no name, no face, no representative country, no known leader, and no known agenda – only a hidden one.

And that is precisely the point. Terrorism continues to achieve success because secret organizations exist. Also, whether or not the media say so, terrorism requires a high degree of sophistication – economic, organizational, scientific, and many other forms of sophistication, of which media sophistication is perhaps the most important.

The demise of the Christian West can be checked only if the truth behind Africa’s resources sector can emerge.

A stranglehold has been effected upon Britain by criminal elements in control of African mining operations, providing the means by which Britain’s reputation as the world’s most enlightened social experiment is grossly abused in the advancement of terrorism and crime. The tendentious and destructive political correctness whereby Divine Authority prosecutes the ordinances of God’s Will on Earth, via the global mass media, has elevated the criminal agenda to the status of the highest authority in the world, from which it commands world leaders and their vaunted defence forces to do its bidding. Through the effects of that covert process a new wave of liberalism has been engineered in the USA, although the USA requires conservatism for its own future security, and for that of the entire world. President Nicolas Sarkozy of France is so closely managed that he will not need to be defeated by political means – he has become is own worst political adversary within two years of taking office. Germany is being isolated in a world where communism is the hottest and hippest new fashion in the global mass media, even as Germany struggles under the burden of reunification with a lamentably information-starved Eastern bloc, which requires proper representation and intelligent economic policies to liberate it from the imbecilities of communism.

Had African South Africans had access to efficient information, such as that disseminated by The Economist, they would instantly recognize themselves in the following passage from its 29^th November issue (page 25), under the title Iraq – is it really coming right?

‘In Mosul, 320 km north of Baghdad up the Tigris river, the governor of Nineveh province, Doraid Kashmoula, furrows his brow, fiddles with his worry-beads in one hand, stubs out yet another cigarette with the other, and reels off a litany of woe in his dankly curtained office. The scion of a prominent Sunni Arab family, he took the job two years ago after his predecessor, his cousin, was assassinated.

‘Since then he has survived half a dozen murder attempts. His son, a brother, and four cousins have been killed by insurgents. His house has been burnt down. He is protected both by the Kurdish guerrillas, who control the eastern half of the city and a clutch of fortified government buildings in the western half, and by the Iraqi army and police, with American forces at their shoulder, when he ventures further afield.

“Security is slowly getting better”, he says, without much conviction. At present the insurgents carry out about ten attacks a day in his province, including car bombs and ambushes, mostly in the vicinity of Mosul. In each of the past four months, more than 100 civilians and about a score of army and police have been killed, according to official figures.’

But South Africans would fail to understand why Iraqis kill Iraqis instead of Americans in the horrible war for which America is blamed in the global mass media. Not having access to efficient information, South Africans believe that the Afrikaner nation was formerly responsible for their woes, and that their own government is presently responsible for their woes. As the case is with the Iraqi insurgents who murder their own people in a wild access of bloodthirstiness, so South Africans do with other Africans who visit their shores, and with their own, out of hatred for the government that they elected, and for its leaders. The case is the same in all African countries. And the sole beneficiary of the process is the concealed power in which African communists blindly invest all their trust, and whose words they parrot verbatim whenever they are shown to wag their fingers at the bad capitalists in the global mass media: the power in control of African strategic mineral resources – which, for all intents and purposes, does not exist, since the media never mention it, and therefore no party can appropriately approach it.

The solution to the world’s problems would lie in a strategy by which the relationship between the security services, the legal profession, and the medical profession with the global mass media be straightened out once and forever. At present, lawyers and journalists are subjected to applications of medical science by which the security services achieve socio-economic effects in matters of national security and international diplomacy. The media report on all events as if no such connection exists, since they do not know of the connection – if they did, journalists could not be telemetrically managed by medical means, and therefore the agenda of Global Organized Crime could not continue to be prosecuted.

In South Africa, the murderess of Taliep Pietersen goes free because a long litany of precedents has been created by which those who actually realize murders through a sustained act of will, and organizational acumen combined with implacable sadism and vindictiveness, go free – and the human instruments elected and activated by them for the purpose are shown in the media to be sanctimoniously condemned by the duped judge, who is rewarded with a masterful performance for the cameras – as if cameras belong in courts of law instead of studios aiming to abuse the public for profit. Thus the true murderers behind appearances go free to commit more murders.

That is the basis upon which all legal matters are now conducted throughout the world, and by which criminals are empowered at the expense of their victims.

That gives the Mafia all the leisure and opportunity in the world to devise novel means by which to prosecute its criminal agenda at the world’s expense.

I was recently given a pet cat, complete with a pretentious name that I had to obediently remember for the Mafia’s benefit. The cat’s previous owner, a saintly man, was dispatched to Australia, to go and corrupt a fine Anglo-Saxon society for the Mafia’s benefit. The cat is to be fed only one particular brand of pet food, and nothing else – which enrolled me into a scientific program of which I know nothing, but which could go horribly wrong if I refuse to keep the cat. The general idea is to insinuate me into a marriage with a political enemy, who will ensure that I never err on the side of law and order whenever the Mafia requires my services. The cat has been associated with Hyundai, the vehicle governing the actions of my daughter’s political enemy, a kind young man to which she has been recently married – whereas the vehicle brands that I require for the advancement of law and order are Toyota Hilux and Toyota Corolla, which are diametrically opposed to the agendas pursued by international security services through Hyundai.

A current South African advertisement for dairy products pretends that those who abstain from dairy grow to be vicious and violent, antagonizing the obsequious culture that the Mafia finds so convenient in prosecuting its murderous charades. However, according to Professor Paul Zane Pilzer, a regular consultant to the US Congress, dairy is an extremely unhealthy product that does far more harm than good, but has been foisted upon the public through malignant advertising practises. All such instances of abuse advance the agenda of Global Organized Crime, and place the blame upon the victims of the process.

The enforcement of secrecy is by far the most efficient means through which the bid for world domination constituted by such obnoxious means is being gradually accomplished at the expense of Christian democracy and of market economy capitalism.

‘Obey the rules of the road!’ is a fitting exhortation for a criminal totalitarian regime posing as Divine Authority intervening in Earthly matters: it places the advertiser squarely on the moral high ground – hard-hearted oppressors would not care so much for their subordinates as to worry about their health and safety – and provides a useful personalized warning to those who believe that secrecy is the Mafia’s greatest single weapon against the society absroved by its pretence at piety and governmental efficacy. Since the real advertiser considered in this context is a covert meta-advertiser, which enters into a joint venture with the government deceived in the process into believing that it is being advantaged, the dynamics work beautifully at every level for the Mafia – while the advertising campaign contributes to the exacerbation of socio-economic decay upon which it thrives.

Public communication must be improved in a process that begins with soap opera. It is perfectly possible to engage a global mass audience in a narrative idiom free from all morbid preoccupation with crime and vice. But that will only be possible if the criminal element can be efficiently prevented from perverting such a positive idiom, through vulgar exaggerations of its best elements, subversive takes on its virtues, heterodox expressions of its mysteries, ironic interpretations of its societal objectives, and so on. In the absence of effective Christianity, the West has lost its moral moorings; it is adrift in a wasteland of depravity and moral bigotry which have been rendered so fashionable, and is enforced by a tendentious political correctness of such unchallengeable moral authority, that all could soon be lost – unless a concerted effort be made to regain lost ground and to move forward with greater intelligence than before.

‘Obey the rules of the road!’ should be directed at the public for the right reasons, so that it would be unnecessary to remind people of the virtues of safe driving and responsible social intercourse.

Liberal Democracy and the Cage of Pain

People who suffer from cancer are victims of war. Nobody now presents with cancer by accident; all have been invariably targeted for coercion and torture by potentates concealed within the network of security services comprised by a thousand companies and a hundred governments in aggregate representing special interests – more particularly, it would seem, by those pretending to bring about a millennium of liberal democracy in which the world will ostensibly be freed from the vagaries and horrors of war – but in truth, from a USA defending countries against terrorists, who in turn ridicule the initiative in their global mass media and generate messianic status for liberal democrats opposed to the war on terror, with rhetoric eliciting pity for terrorists on grounds of a spurious and destructive political correctness. Yet the brand of unconventional war waged by those potentates is far more brutish than any form of military war, since, with the assistance of dedicated media obfuscation, it targets civilians standing upright in plain view while under fire from lethal ambush.

The great advantage of cancer as a weapon of war and instrument of torture is that it wins battles for the belligerents involved, of which the media know almost nothing and the public even less. Military battles are difficult by comparison, because they are given names by the media, and governments become involved, which causes people to require statistics and reasons for the assessment of events – inevitably leading to calls for accountability.

Concealed potentates responsible for the telemetric manipulation of target victims for criminal purposes, through a dynamic of transactional management, reduce human life on Earth to the parameters of a hidden agenda prosecuting political and economic change through totalitarian social engineering techniques disguised as fashionable trends behind false appearances generated in the public media.

Pain immobilizes its victim. It confines him in the cage of an arrested society, and reduces the quality of his life to the minimum level. Pain results in effective work and study to be accomplished only with great difficulty. A normal life of love, recreation, and rest is simply no longer possible.

Motor-car accidents are particularly useful to Global Organized Crime: they offer an array of painful ailments which could be sadistically exacerbated in the event of the target victim proving resilient to implementing the socio-economic program covertly enforced by those means.

Diabetes, arthritis, asthma, tuberculosis, and other degenerative diseases have long been managed as elements of political regimes, over many years during which the conditions of patients continue to deteriorate even as growing percentages of doctor’s fees and medical aid premiums are directed into the accounts of concealed potentates conducting the program.

During the 1970s and ‘80s abnormal psychology accounted for a large part of the sickness industry, having developed as a form of coercion in countries such as South Africa, where people who knew too much, having accidentally seen or heard things related to gross oppression or torture, had to be managed by means of a system not easily contestable by family or employers, while ensuring that information remains within clearly defined boundaries from which no escape is possible. The South African cartel economic model, dominated by the British-owned resources sector, extended its policy of zero tolerance for economic competition from any quarter into the body politic, thus modelling cultural dynamics around its rapacious monopolistic strategies. The notorious Apartheid government was the proud product of that policy, until more efficacious systems for oppression were devised and marketed to the world in the form of popular liberal policies such as those now implemented in the USA.

The cage of pain within which I have been recently enclosed greatly reduces my will to continue disclosing the issues that preoccupy me. The pain constantly exhausts me, and focuses my mind on possible escapes from my plight as offered by means of personalized advertisements on national television. It slows me down, and prevents me from finding essential conclusions to arguments that could produce break-throughs in negotiations between authorities and the leadership of organized crime.

About fourteen years ago, I found myself beleaguered by many addictions and growing unaccountably amenable to many things from which my austere childhood required that I instinctively recoil. One day I sat biting down extremely hard on sweets offered by my children – round, rock-hard candy of no particular flavour or memorable taste – an experience that moved me to warn my children that biting on the sweets could cause their teeth to crack. The intention to bite down extremely hard on the sweets was imputed into my sensibility, and the action imputed into my neuro-muscular system, which could have been prepared for such purposes by ten years of dutiful exercise at the local gymnasium, during which many repetitive actions could be isolated, analyzed, and reproduced by telemetric means.

But, during the intervening fourteen years, the cracked molar never presented me with difficulty. On the contrary, an abscess was formed at the root of a tooth above the cracked one, through the effects of which I was first made aware of the ‘cage of pain’ into which any target victim could be trapped without recourse to addressing the matter, due to a lack of means to obtain evidence against those responsible.

Also, my mother developed a biological heart defect during the years when I became aware of the undisclosed forms of coercion in which the society that I represented was trapped. The left ventricle of my mother’s heart failed at crucial times, when I had prepared for showdowns with political enemies over policy changes that I wanted implemented during the early post-Apartheid years, in a power-struggle that characterized socio-economic polemics of the Apartheid decades. I realized that my mother’s condition was exacerbated whenever I worked myself into an unchallengeable position in the struggle for national liberation.

My cracked tooth became the basis for a cage of pain only recently: I was given money by my family, and told to make an appointment with the dentist. As I walked up to the building where the dentist has his rooms on the day of my appointment, I passed a SAAB vehicle whose number plate read: ‘Dagger’. I associated the SAAB brand name with military weapons systems, and with a church into which I was insinuated, probably by a constituency representing the South African Democratic Alliance, with whose bright yellow and blue colours I was continually associated during a time when I needed to support the ANC’s president Mbeki, who sought to work with the American republicans.

A young man in school uniform arrived out of schedule and was treated in my place. I waited patiently. When he emerged from the theatre, he was visibly shaken with pain. The dentist elected to fill my tooth without an injection of local anaesthetic. He drilled into the live nerve and filled the tooth. Once he had done, I sat up and spat thick blood into the basin. Those stages were put in place as part of a familiar ritual by which I would recognize the work of the security services, as I do in every other aspect of my life. The pain, that soon grew more and more intense, seemed an inevitable corollary. Having been supplied with a rationalization for the locality of the pain, I soon accepted that it would be futile to seek to change the regime thus established. But the cage of pain became operative; my tormentors are free to turn up the pain level at will, thus to closely control my behavior in the process.

It seems as if a radiation treatment is applied, by the effects of which the tooth hurts in a way that affects my ear, my throat, other teeth, my lips, and eyes, along with facial pains deriving from stress in trying to determine causes behind matters as presented in news bulletins. High degrees of resolve are required to reach the conclusions presented here, because those involved in agendas on which I comment exercise direct effects upon me, that are calculated to divert my attention to the many pleasant and lucrative lifestyles that I could enjoy instead of concerning myself with difficult, dangerous matters.

I started writing down my thoughts and observations some eight years ago, when I lived with my mother and my sister, and was given access to a PC. I taught myself to type, and set to writing out philosophical issues of a religious nature that had preoccupied me at the time. Soon, however, I was moved to comment on current affairs. As I focused on the issues that impacted most powerfully on the national situation, I found myself continually moved away from the use of sets of brands representing the conservative position that I sought to occupy, which caused things to work out well for the country, and moved instead towards sets of brands representing terrorists, communists, and criminals as fine people whose causes deserve to prevail – which caused things to work out abominably for the country.

However, my stupid struggles must somehow have had the right effect at some level, for I am now enabled to reach a public – perhaps a closely circumscribed one, but a public nevertheless, rather than the police or other authorities who work far from public comment exclusively. That must mean that an arrangement has been reached by which the dirty secrets that I attack are to be gradually released into the public domain. That gives me cause for immense hope: I have long perceived a mechanism by which those responsible for suffering in others have recourse to crossing a bridge into a safe haven, provided only (presumably) that they desist from prosecuting the dynamics causing the suffering.

It seems to me incredibly important that such a mechanism must be constantly improved with use, so that evils can be addressed in terms that produce positive results, rather than to have a situation obdurately continue where an entire nation is delivered into the hands of concealed misanthropists who refuse to put themsleves in the positions of those who suffer as a result of their totalitarian social engineering drives. Throughout the years in which I monitored developments, I never once found that the sadistic schemes calculated to coerce people into abjuring their convictions actually worked. Those who capitulated beneath the pressure of flattery and promises were going to blindly pursue their personal obsessions from the start, having never acquired requisite background to assume responsibility for the world that they help to create. Those whose lives were threatened with terminal diseases understandably felt that they had no choice but to comply, but only because they were isolated individuals pitted against a united enemy – like prisoners of war being captured, not like cowardly soldiers hiding from action. The morally strong ones always endure to the bitter end.

It seems that those responsible for all suffering endured in a modern world that was created on strength of the promise to improve the quality of life – to save people from the aches and pains of accident, age, and disease – have been rendered profoundly unbalanced by their refusal to gain requisite perspective on the nature of existence in terms of the cycle of birth and death, which argues that quittance will have to be made for every injustice perpetrated upon every other – for the simple reason that any less efficient view would insult the intelligence behind the powers of nature and of the Universe. A change-over of roles would have to be effected in terms of the relative relations of power between every sadist and his or her victim from one life to another in a journey through the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth into new worlds in any universe as intelligent as this one promises to be.

Those who refuse to appreciate the wisdom of organized religion confront the world with a dilemma: the entire Universe, with its system of planets appointed to host life, is rendered unbalanced by the need to re-establish order through penance made for crimes that could have been avoided. Hence the instinctive disapproval that religionists feel for non-conformists. Yet such things cannot be perfectly understood during the present time, in which barbarous thought systems dominate – speculation remains the sole vehicle by which intuitions of that nature may be systematized, and oppression easily overtakes efforts to regiment behavior.

Still, the notion of an entire world subjected to the vagaries of mentally disturbed misanthropes who have usurped the prerogatives of God makes me feel extremely uneasy. I once spoke to a former hardened criminal who had converted to Christianity, and became an ordained priest in a Pentecostal denomination – who told me in grisly detail how God had cured him from addiction to steroids, and how he had to be taken right to the edge of the abyss by means of terminal cancer, of which God cured him at the last moment in order to redeem his formerly criminal nature. His story was rendered unforgettable by a single detail: he said that, during the worst phase of his ordeal, when his mother pushed his wheel-chair into the foyer of the hospital, the pain was so great that a crack in the floor as large as that of the groove between two tiles, would knock his breath clean out of him, every time.

Yet as I listened to the once errant priest, I already knew what I could not then confide in him: the Mafia has usurped the prerogatives of God; it hourly interlopes between God and His creatures – and it does so for criminal purposes. It seeks to profit from the suffering and deaths of innocent people in order to bring about political and economic changes that would render the world more amenable to the agendas of barbarians who find the acquaintance of ordinary people repulsive, and can deal with them only when they are managed at the impersonal level of target subjects in ICT surveillance regimes. Moreover, they subject them to the indignity of suffering from serious diseases to the point of death, where they deign to grant them spectacular faith cures or death-bed conversions in prosecution of an agenda too sinister to be made known to the public: a bid to take control of the process by which human life is perpetuated through childbirth. They wish to take control of the process by which hosts of souls hourly speed to Earth for incarnation through childbirth, thus to arrange indefinite continued lives for themselves in the bodies of others – without the vexation of encountering opposition.

In order to realize that insanely ambitious quest, the criminals need to govern the mules who conduct the global drug trade from which the larger part of their profits accrue in a manner that could save the lives of key operatives even if it would involve deceiving both the church and the medical profession – which would require that the entire world be turned upside down.

Simple African Christians and Arab Muslims would think very little of the world if they had to know that the ancient convention of trust had fallen on such unworthy times as to render it folly in the eyes of the powerful. However, in that respect they would find themselves in the illustrious company of Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. Bill Gates is on record as having often stressed the fundamental importance of building superb relationships. Warren Buffett’s most famous manager emphasized that Buffett trusts him so implicitly that he would sooner die than to shock that trust. Simply, those two venerable sages had the backing of their massive capital power to navigate them past the imperfections of the world, whereas simple African and Arab religionists have nothing of the kind.

The notion of reversing the direction of causality by which Nature teaches her creatures to adapt and thrive through the hard lessons of growing to adulthood in a dangerous environment, for the purpose of profiting from the effects of crime, must rate as one of the worst ideas ever conceived of. Surely the time has come for those who flourish on strength of such notions to reconsider the direction that they have taken on behalf of the world’s people in their capacity as custodians of science and of management systems.

The criminals driving the agenda discussed here suffer from precisely the same factor as that upon which they depend for success with victims subjected to the indignity of disease: fear. The fear of death and of having to relinquish the control built up at such a terrible price over an entire lifetime is too great to permit of the final letting go of the things of this world that death represents to ‘mere mortals’. Although criminals would not graciously admit it, they have great cause to fear a confrontation with the powers that established them in their present incarnation on this planet at this phase of its history. Whatever the case may be, surely the entire world should not continue to suffer indefinitely as a result of something so invidious as the cowardice of the cruellest people living among them today?

The challenge directed at athletes and other strivers against the limitations into which human beings have been covenanted by the powers that constituted them among these realms is being disingenuously abused in a bid to set a ‘pain barrier’ for every human endeavour by which disease and misery can be justified in the interests of increased profits for criminals.

Absolute Evil is moving to undo the work of Creation. Those who can must do whatever possible to prevent it from succeeding.

Terrorism and Zimbabwe’s diamonds

The media will tell you that it cannot be possible for any correspondence to exist between media violence on the matter of Zimbabwean politics and the terrorist bombs in Mumbai. The media will tell you also that no correspondence can exist between the Mumbai bombs and the fact that the world’s best defence against terrorism is vacating his office at the White House to make room for a messiah mandated to substitute the war on terror with ‘hope’.

Yet the correspondence between those factors is very close indeed. And had not the media been tasked with preventing public awareness of those correspondences, the world would have been a very different place – one where murderous maniacs could not rule with impunity.

Informed observers, those who stand outside the media choir singing that Zimbabwe’s problems have something to do with unpopular leaders clinging to power and popular leaders failing to lift them out of the saddle – that is, observers who utterly disregard the media’s fairy stories, and focus on the ferocious covert dogfight between special interests from many parts of the globe for ownership of Zimbabwe’s totally magnificent diamond and platinum reefs – such observers know that India was punished for seeking to elevate its relations with Africa to a level beyond the graft and vice characterizing present efforts to prevent African economic development for the purpose of filling the pockets of its worst enemies with profits accruing from African wealth: the sub-continent’s British-owned, South African-based strategic mineral resources sector.

Surely the altogether extraordinary unpopularity that had been painstakingly engineered for Mr. Mugabe by resources sectors that control the global mass media in the perceptions of the international community is much more closely connected to that sector’s coveting Zimbabwe’s strategic mineral resources than to whether or not illiterate starvelings comprising the Zimbabwean proletariat ‘like’ Mr. Mugabe any less or more than they ‘like’ Morgan Tshvangirai?

One factor that hugely enhances the capability of those who covertly control the media to mystify the public with dissimulation is the economic innocence of some South African legal officials, who ascribe the country’s problems to the petty racial bigotry of simple people who at last learned that their victims will be prepared to suffer, and even to die, for freedom. The Mafia’s global leadership does not care a fig for those who wish to die for freedom. Its members daily maim and murder to their hearts’ content, through terrorism, HIV-Aids, cancer, and a thousand other primitive means, in order to get their hands on Africa’s enormous mineral wealth. They torture millions of people to the point of death with horrific pain levels sustained by means of telemetric applications of medical science – blasting their lives to the very Gates of Hell in the most lethal totalitarian regime ever heard or dreamed of on Earth. But the media maintain a thunderous silence on the horrific reality behind appearances, for the simple reason that they as little suspect its existence as does the public.

Legal officials should be obliged to remain abreast of the economic causes of political developments, so that they will not fall prey to dutifully parroting the media.

South Africa’s economically unsophisticated leaders and constituencies cannot gain access to the intelligence considered here, because barriers to perception are erected between all groupings by those who control the security services and legal institutions responsible for the dissemination of information on matters of national security – which, as has been shown in previous ports of this blog, happen to be the very same powers that control both the global resources sector and the global mass media. I daily watch the responses of men burdened with great responsibility, such as Mr, Jacob Zuma – responses which clearly reflect that my advice to them has been transmitted either in incomplete or in perverted form. I rationally deduce that those who wield the power over governments and electorates alike simply do not care to have their plans thwarted by observers who enjoy unencumbered visibility on their millennial designs.

My advice to Mr. Zuma has consistently been that he stand down – that he withdraw his candidacy from the presidential elections. Those seeking unconditional ownership of Africa’s mineral resources are absolutely ruthless. They will not hesitate for a moment to plunge South Africa and Zimbabawe into bloody civil war – an objective which could be accomplished, among other means, by charging Mr. Zuma with corruption after he has been appointed as the South African president, so that not only he will be destroyed, but the entire country with him. Even if Mr. Zuma is charged before the elections, his huge support base, the sub-continent’s proletariat, which has been indulged by the media for the purpose of fomenting division and stoking antagonism between communists and other groups, shall declare that it shall have no further part of the white man’s laws in this country. The result will be anarchy and bloody civil war, the long tried and tested, and now fail-proof recipe for global special interests in resources to retain power over all recently ‘liberated’ African countries. Only one course could have averted a blood-bath: steadfast refusal by the media to indulge illiterate starvelings with a drive fanatically championing the popularity and legitimacy of their preferred candidate, who, in the final analysis, constitutes an entirely arbitrary choice, since the personal identities of leaders are subordinated to the importance of the global constituencies represented by them.

Worse still, Mr. Zuma has personally set the precedent by which South African and other presidents can be fired at twenty-four hours’ notice. His chances of leading South Africa to success are at nearly zero, whereas his chances of delivering its livelihood into the hands of its enemies are at nearly maximum.

A fundamental barbarism characterises those who abuse the philosophy of liberal democracy for criminal purposes. The history of terrorism started a great distance away from the carnage of Mumbai. A brief note on its history may reveal something of its principal drivers’ national identities.

In the 1960s, the popularity of the British band The Beatles overwhelmed the world in a media campaign synchronized with the widespread abuse of LSD and marijuana – ‘Hippie’ culture. In the 1970s, the art movement abstract expressionism overwhelmed the world with a primitive vernacular idiom in every respect comparable to the hysterical media-driven phenomenon of the Beatles – synchronized with the widespread abuse of the lethal substance heroin, which was smuggled into the USA during the Vietnam war. TIME magazine’s Australian-born art critic, Robert Hughes, wrote in his book Nothing if not critical how Art News magazine reported in a hagiographic tone that the face of Yaweh could be seen peering at the viewer from between the red, yellow, and blue sections of Kenneth Noland’s painting of the size of The Last Judgement, ‘Red, Yellow, and Blue’ – and that if one could not see Yaweh, that did not mean that He was not there – it meant only that Yaweh does not show His face to goyim from the southern Pacific.

Thus music was perverted through relegation to the level of nursery rhymes, to prepare the way for barbaric assaults on the sensibility through massive decibel levels facilitated by modern electronic sound technology. Art was perverted through relegation to the obnoxious activities of wild men, who soon banished all legitimate art forms. Provisions deriving from those phenomena were attended by an increasingly authoritarian political correctness, whose ordinances rendered all things derived from Christianity, democracy, and the market economy abominable in public opinion, and rendered Islam, communism, and cartel economics acceptable substitutes to fill the gaps left where an Anglo-Saxon Calvinist culture previously flourished.

New Millennium conditions permitted the perversion of literature and film by means of the gigantically media-hyped Harry Potter series of books and films, which relegated literature and film to the level of a previously despised genre: the Gothic novel, the subject of Jane Austen’s masterpiece Mansfield Park, which warns that young ladies who read Gothic novels invariably come under the influence of hooligans, and land up in desperately compromised social situations. As has been stated in a previous port of this blog, the dramatis personae of the Harry Potter stories supply heroin smugglers and child molesters with a cast of roles for weird, darkly enhanced adults with whom to identify in extremities resulting from the ultimate horror of heroin addiction and entrapment in the child pornography industry that complements it. Thus literature has joined the company of music and art at a level of redundancy to which the Church has long been reduced.

Throughout the period in which those millennial changes came about, soap opera offered a perverted version of social intercourse to justify the sub-cultures needed to expand the market for heroin, diamonds, arms, and other forms of contraband, and to popularize the mendacity through which criminality is to be expanded in developed countries, and socio-economic conditions are to be exacerbated in developing countries.

Now the world has become accustomed to massive acts of war known as ‘terrorism’, which differs from other forms of warfare in that it is waged by one side against the other in every country of the world, rather than between two particular nation-states – but is never replied to in kind, because the identities of those responsible cannot be known even to Interpol, the Pentagon, and NATO. Concealed manipulators of the media have constantly sent America on wild goose chases after bearded Arab nationals and Russian KGB agents thought to have served as instruments in isolated atrocities – thus preventing intelligent thinking on the identities of those ultimately profiting from the carnage. As a result, the police services are to this day mystified by the prospect of correspondences between any two or more crimes against humanity – they display a studied ignorance of concepts of a centrally coordinated Global Organized Crime deploying terrorism as a big stick against those who fail to comply with their demands for ownership of the world’s strategic mineral resources.

My purpose in offering this blog, by which the media version of international affairs be daily contradicted, and the perspective withheld from the public be offered in its place, is to suggest a way in which those responsible for terrorism might be identified – namely to connect them with other forms of unconventional warfare and with the phenomena associated with unchallengeable reputations for respectability.

The public should long have suspected that the great song and dance made over figures who flourish the more as the fortunes of the US president, the Pope of the Catholic Church, the Queen of England, and the leaders of democratically elected governments correspondingly flag, and as Christian democratic culture increasingly flounders, could prove to constitute nothing but a Trojan Horse full of murderous Greeks clenching daggers between their teeth, waiting with rolling, blood-shot eyes for the moment when they will silently pour down the streets of the sleeping city in the light of the moon. But the diabolical pro-active dissimulation perpetuated by global mass media is simply too powerful for any sane perspective to remain beneath the waves of mass hysteria daily generated over side-shows that distract the public’s attention from essentials.

Another principal element in the strategy of war waged against the Christian West through the popular formats of its own media is the barbaric interpretation of Darwinism that has over the past four decades supplied the perfect alibi for a philosophy of the survival of the most brutish. That barbaric philosophy is perpetuated via dynamics by which all intuitions of a design behind the world’s operations are ridiculed and abased. One is expected to imagine that the intelligence behind natural phenomena, the laws of mathematics, chemistry, and physics, and behind the measured regularity and ingenious composition of covenants governing organic life – the changing tides of the sea and the moon, the regularity of interchange between day and night, sleep and waking, life and death, the well-appointed dualities characterizing the two genders, with the fateful content of their respective functions – not to mention the inexorable, ineluctable finality of the Moral Law guiding all live creatures toward a more just, more intelligent world through the effects of pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, damnation and salvation – that those are all products of mere happenstance.

That animals continually develop as a result of interaction with their environment is the last phenomenon that could be submitted as proof that the human race came about as an exclusive result of the most brutish volitions to be found in nature and the Universe. When seen in context with the other cultural elements listed above, the mendacity insisting on that view reeks of a coordinated attack on human intelligence itself. Those who have usurped the prerogatives of God for criminal purposes barbarously presume that because they can deceive their victims they can also deceive the forces that constituted them in their present incarnation on this particular planet at this moment in time. They continue obdurate in their barbarous convictions, because they could not otherwise justify their atrocities, even to themselves.

The assault on reason is today nowhere driven with more fanatic zeal than in obtuse communist cultures fostered in dirt-poor African countries cursed with fantastic strategic mineral resources coveted by the worst criminals ever seen on Earth.

Concealed potentates who despise uneducated Africans know very well that dull, un-cut and un-polished diamonds are worth precisely as much as their cut and polished brethren – although their shabby present appearance does not compare favourably with the deep brilliance of their lustrous counterparts. Those potentates know equally well that dull, uneducated humans are potentially worth precisely as much as their educated, accomplished brethren, whose vital ideas and capabilities render them highly valuable to society. Yet, although such despisers of Africans will rate all wanton discarding of un-cut diamonds as evidence of either unredeemable ignorance or insanity, they would discard underdeveloped humans without further ado – a sure sign that human affairs have degenerated to the level of absolute corruption and of imminent cataclysm. The human race will not permit technology to endure if it is going to be deployed as a weapon of war against those concerned with the fundamentals of existence rather than with extreme orders of experience exclusively.

In the next port to be written for this blog, whose title absolutely has to be Liberal Democracy and the Pain Barrier, it will be shown that medical science has long been usurped for criminal purposes by those who seek to deploy it as a weapon of war that must coerce the human race into acceptance of things that could never be acceptable to sane and morally intelligent people. It will be shown also that the legal system and the security services are subordinated to the vagaries of a totalitarian regime whose provisions make nonsense of any attempt to develop new military techniques for use in the settlement of conflicts: the human body is now attacked directly, secretly, from a distance, and with the unwitting but dedicated assistance of the target victim’s family and friends – without any need for the use of heavy, expensive metal machines designed for the purpose of destroying bodies in foreign countries.

Military war is no longer the worst horror to be found on Earth. Conservatism is no longer the most intolerant political view to be found on Earth, if it ever was that. Today war is waged by means never before associated with militarism, but rather with human rights and with programs of constitutional empowerment. Today the provisions of liberal democracy are abused by concealed, malign manipulators of affairs who aim to exterminate and to terrorise with massive bombs and other forms of slaughter. Anglo-Saxon culture has been destroyed by British criminal elements resolved to confiscate the world’s strategic mineral resources on grounds derived from their earlier experience as the stewards and governors of colonialism. Those criminal elements abused the Irish quest for independence in forcing Britain to covertly continue its colonization of foreign countries through confiscation of their mineral resources. Their modus operandi is to exacerbate socio-economic decay through the breakdown of discipline, so that evils can be introduced unseen and can be disguised as virtues through interminable insinuation by the mass media – obtaining purchase upon insufficiently protected national resources in the process.

The most important thing that the public now needs to realize is this: In a world where terrorism in India results from the frustration of criminal elements associated with British special interests to obtain Zimbabwe’s diamonds and platinum, the international police has a duty to require from the media that clear correspondences be drawn between matters presently given out as wholly unrelated, and that spurious associations be discontinued. The most recent terrorist attack supplies as good an example as could be wished for. Media-induced pre-occupation with south Asian politics will obfuscate the link with resources owners requiring compliance from India with respect to its African relations in the procurement of commodities.

The criminal element responsible for terrorism maintains its advantage through media strategy. It is as much as the International Police can do to remain ahead of a cynical game against criminals casting themselves into the role of righteous judges and relegating the police to the status of criminals. Similarly, the new American liberalism was brought about by the British resources special interests in control of the mass media under consideration in this essay, as the case also was with South Africa. The pretence sustained in the global mass media is that a benign liberal regime has made a contract with the developing world to rid it of a tyrannous conservative America, thus to bring about world peace and freedom for all. Unfortunately the USA was never half as tyrannous as the power now in control of the world, which confiscates the strategic mineral resources of the previously colonized developing countries that trust it.

The new American liberalism is therefore an abomination that will cost the human race its experiment with modernism. Humankind will return to life in a state of nature, for the simple reason that it is offered no choice in the matter: barbarism in possession of technology reduces the chances of human survival, whereas barbarism, or any other mode of being, without technology, does not threaten human survival. And barbarism has proved that nothing can prevent it from ascending to the level of absolute power in a technological world. Unless the media be subjected to rigorous testing for veracity in every matter reported upon, and severe punishments be prosecuted against those responsible for deception, modernism must necessarily fail. But it is late in the day to launch programs of that nature.

Terrorism and Zimbabwe’s diamonds

The media will tell you that it cannot be possible for any correspondence to exist between media violence on the matter of Zimbabwean politics and the terrorist bombs in Mumbai. The media will tell you also that no correspondence can exist between the Mumbai bombs and the fact that the world’s best defence against terrorism is vacating his office at the White House to make room for a messiah mandated to substitute the war on terror with ‘hope’.

Yet the correspondence between those factors is very close indeed. And had not the media been tasked with preventing public awareness of those correspondences, the world would have been a very different place – one where murderous maniacs could not rule with impunity.

Informed observers, those who stand outside the media choir singing that Zimbabwe’s problems have something to do with unpopular leaders clinging to power and popular leaders failing to lift them out of the saddle – that is, observers who utterly disregard the media’s fairy stories, and focus on the ferocious covert dogfight between special interests from many parts of the globe for ownership of Zimbabwe’s totally magnificent diamond and platinum reefs – such observers know that India was punished for seeking to elevate its relations with Africa to a level beyond the graft and vice characterizing present efforts to prevent African economic development for the purpose of filling the pockets of its worst enemies with profits accruing from African wealth: the sub-continent’s British-owned, South African-based strategic mineral resources sector.

Surely the altogether extraordinary unpopularity that had been painstakingly engineered for Mr. Mugabe by resources sectors that control the global mass media in the perceptions of the international community is much more closely connected to that sector’s coveting Zimbabwe’s strategic mineral resources than to whether or not illiterate starvelings comprising the Zimbabwean proletariat ‘like’ Mr. Mugabe any less or more than they ‘like’ Morgan Tshvangirai?

One factor that hugely enhances the capability of those who covertly control the media to mystify the public with dissimulation is the economic innocence of some South African legal officials, who ascribe the country’s problems to the petty racial bigotry of simple people who at last learned that their victims will be prepared to suffer, and even to die, for freedom. The Mafia’s global leadership does not care a fig for those who wish to die for freedom. Its members daily maim and murder to their hearts’ content, through terrorism, HIV-Aids, cancer, and a thousand other primitive means, in order to get their hands on Africa’s enormous mineral wealth. They torture millions of people to the point of death with horrific pain levels sustained by means of telemetric applications of medical science – blasting their lives to the very Gates of Hell in the most lethal totalitarian regime ever heard or dreamed of on Earth. But the media maintain a thunderous silence on the horrific reality behind appearances, for the simple reason that they as little suspect its existence as does the public.

Legal officials should be obliged to remain abreast of the economic causes of political developments, so that they will not fall prey to dutifully parroting the media.

South Africa’s economically unsophisticated leaders and constituencies cannot gain access to the intelligence considered here, because barriers to perception are erected between all groupings by those who control the security services and legal institutions responsible for the dissemination of information on matters of national security – which, as has been shown in previous ports of this blog, happen to be the very same powers that control both the global resources sector and the global mass media. I daily watch the responses of men burdened with great responsibility, such as Mr, Jacob Zuma – responses which clearly reflect that my advice to them has been transmitted either in incomplete or in perverted form. I rationally deduce that those who wield the power over governments and electorates alike simply do not care to have their plans thwarted by observers who enjoy unencumbered visibility on their millennial designs.

My advice to Mr. Zuma has consistently been that he stand down – that he withdraw his candidacy from the presidential elections. Those seeking unconditional ownership of Africa’s mineral resources are absolutely ruthless. They will not hesitate for a moment to plunge South Africa and Zimbabawe into bloody civil war – an objective which could be accomplished, among other means, by charging Mr. Zuma with corruption after he has been appointed as the South African president, so that not only he will be destroyed, but the entire country with him. Even if Mr. Zuma is charged before the elections, his huge support base, the sub-continent’s proletariat, which has been indulged by the media for the purpose of fomenting division and stoking antagonism between communists and other groups, shall declare that it shall have no further part of the white man’s laws in this country. The result will be anarchy and bloody civil war, the long tried and tested, and now fail-proof recipe for global special interests in resources to retain power over all recently ‘liberated’ African countries. Only one course could have averted a blood-bath: steadfast refusal by the media to indulge illiterate starvelings with a drive fanatically championing the popularity and legitimacy of their preferred candidate, who, in the final analysis, constitutes an entirely arbitrary choice, since the personal identities of leaders are subordinated to the importance of the global constituencies represented by them.

Worse still, Mr. Zuma has personally set the precedent by which South African and other presidents can be fired at twenty-four hours’ notice. His chances of leading South Africa to success are at nearly zero, whereas his chances of delivering its livelihood into the hands of its enemies are at nearly maximum.

A fundamental barbarism characterises those who abuse the philosophy of liberal democracy for criminal purposes. The history of terrorism started a great distance away from the carnage of Mumbai. A brief note on its history may reveal something of its principal drivers’ national identities.

In the 1960s, the popularity of the British band The Beatles overwhelmed the world in a media campaign synchronized with the widespread abuse of LSD and marijuana – ‘Hippie’ culture. In the 1970s, the art movement abstract expressionism overwhelmed the world with a primitive vernacular idiom in every respect comparable to the hysterical media-driven phenomenon of the Beatles – synchronized with the widespread abuse of the lethal substance heroin, which was smuggled into the USA during the Vietnam war. TIME magazine’s Australian-born art critic, Robert Hughes, wrote in his book Nothing if not critical how Art News magazine reported in a hagiographic tone that the face of Yaweh could be seen peering at the viewer from between the red, yellow, and blue sections of Kenneth Noland’s painting of the size of The Last Judgement, ‘Red, Yellow, and Blue’ – and that if one could not see Yaweh, that did not mean that He was not there – it meant only that Yaweh does not show His face to goyim from the southern Pacific.

Thus music was perverted through relegation to the level of nursery rhymes, to prepare the way for barbaric assaults on the sensibility through massive decibel levels facilitated by modern electronic sound technology. Art was perverted through relegation to the obnoxious activities of wild men, who soon banished all legitimate art forms. Provisions deriving from those phenomena were attended by an increasingly authoritarian political correctness, whose ordinances rendered all things derived from Christianity, democracy, and the market economy abominable in public opinion, and rendered Islam, communism, and cartel economics acceptable substitutes to fill the gaps left where an Anglo-Saxon Calvinist culture previously flourished.

New Millennium conditions permitted the perversion of literature and film by means of the gigantically media-hyped Harry Potter series of books and films, which relegated literature and film to the level of a previously despised genre: the Gothic novel, the subject of Jane Austen’s masterpiece Mansfield Park, which warns that young ladies who read Gothic novels invariably come under the influence of hooligans, and land up in desperately compromised social situations. As has been stated in a previous port of this blog, the dramatis personae of the Harry Potter stories supply heroin smugglers and child molesters with a cast of roles for weird, darkly enhanced adults with whom to identify in extremities resulting from the ultimate horror of heroin addiction and entrapment in the child pornography industry that complements it. Thus literature has joined the company of music and art at a level of redundancy to which the Church has long been reduced.

Throughout the period in which those millennial changes came about, soap opera offered a perverted version of social intercourse to justify the sub-cultures needed to expand the market for heroin, diamonds, arms, and other forms of contraband, and to popularize the mendacity through which criminality is to be expanded in developed countries, and socio-economic conditions are to be exacerbated in developing countries.

Now the world has become accustomed to massive acts of war known as ‘terrorism’, which differs from other forms of warfare in that it is waged by one side against the other in every country of the world, rather than between two particular nation-states – but is never replied to in kind, because the identities of those responsible cannot be known even to Interpol, the Pentagon, and NATO. Concealed manipulators of the media have constantly sent America on wild goose chases after bearded Arab nationals and Russian KGB agents thought to have served as instruments in isolated atrocities – thus preventing intelligent thinking on the identities of those ultimately profiting from the carnage. As a result, the police services are to this day mystified by the prospect of correspondences between any two or more crimes against humanity – they display a studied ignorance of concepts of a centrally coordinated Global Organized Crime deploying terrorism as a big stick against those who fail to comply with their demands for ownership of the world’s strategic mineral resources.

My purpose in offering this blog, by which the media version of international affairs be daily contradicted, and the perspective withheld from the public be offered in its place, is to suggest a way in which those responsible for terrorism might be identified – namely to connect them with other forms of unconventional warfare and with the phenomena associated with unchallengeable reputations for respectability.

The public should long have suspected that the great song and dance made over figures who flourish the more as the fortunes of the US president, the Pope of the Catholic Church, the Queen of England, and the leaders of democratically elected governments correspondingly flag, and as Christian democratic culture increasingly flounders, could prove to constitute nothing but a Trojan Horse full of murderous Greeks clenching daggers between their teeth, waiting with rolling, blood-shot eyes for the moment when they will silently pour down the streets of the sleeping city in the light of the moon. But the diabolical pro-active dissimulation perpetuated by global mass media is simply too powerful for any sane perspective to remain beneath the waves of mass hysteria daily generated over side-shows that distract the public’s attention from essentials.

Another principal element in the strategy of war waged against the Christian West through the popular formats of its own media is the barbaric interpretation of Darwinism that has over the past four decades supplied the perfect alibi for a philosophy of the survival of the most brutish. That barbaric philosophy is perpetuated via dynamics by which all intuitions of a design behind the world’s operations are ridiculed and abased. One is expected to imagine that the intelligence behind natural phenomena, the laws of mathematics, chemistry, and physics, and behind the measured regularity and ingenious composition of covenants governing organic life – the changing tides of the sea and the moon, the regularity of interchange between day and night, sleep and waking, life and death, the well-appointed dualities characterizing the two genders, with the fateful content of their respective functions – not to mention the inexorable, ineluctable finality of the Moral Law guiding all live creatures toward a more just, more intelligent world through the effects of pleasure and pain, crime and punishment, damnation and salvation – that those are all products of mere happenstance.

That animals continually develop as a result of interaction with their environment is the last phenomenon that could be submitted as proof that the human race came about as an exclusive result of the most brutish volitions to be found in nature and the Universe. When seen in context with the other cultural elements listed above, the mendacity insisting on that view reeks of a coordinated attack on human intelligence itself. Those who have usurped the prerogatives of God for criminal purposes barbarously presume that because they can deceive their victims they can also deceive the forces that constituted them in their present incarnation on this particular planet at this moment in time. They continue obdurate in their barbarous convictions, because they could not otherwise justify their atrocities, even to themselves.

The assault on reason is today nowhere driven with more fanatic zeal than in obtuse communist cultures fostered in dirt-poor African countries cursed with fantastic strategic mineral resources coveted by the worst criminals ever seen on Earth.

Concealed potentates who despise uneducated Africans know very well that dull, un-cut and un-polished diamonds are worth precisely as much as their cut and polished brethren – although their shabby present appearance does not compare favourably with the deep brilliance of their lustrous counterparts. Those potentates know equally well that dull, uneducated humans are potentially worth precisely as much as their educated, accomplished brethren, whose vital ideas and capabilities render them highly valuable to society. Yet, although such despisers of Africans will rate all wanton discarding of un-cut diamonds as evidence of either unredeemable ignorance or insanity, they would discard underdeveloped humans without further ado – a sure sign that human affairs have degenerated to the level of absolute corruption and of imminent cataclysm. The human race will not permit technology to endure if it is going to be deployed as a weapon of war against those concerned with the fundamentals of existence rather than with extreme orders of experience exclusively.

In the next port to be written for this blog, whose title absolutely has to be Liberal Democracy and the Pain Barrier, it will be shown that medical science has long been usurped for criminal purposes by those who seek to deploy it as a weapon of war that must coerce the human race into acceptance of things that could never be acceptable to sane and morally intelligent people. It will be shown also that the legal system and the security services are subordinated to the vagaries of a totalitarian regime whose provisions make nonsense of any attempt to develop new military techniques for use in the settlement of conflicts: the human body is now attacked directly, secretly, from a distance, and with the unwitting but dedicated assistance of the target victim’s family and friends – without any need for the use of heavy, expensive metal machines designed for the purpose of destroying bodies in foreign countries.

Military war is no longer the worst horror to be found on Earth. Conservatism is no longer the most intolerant political view to be found on Earth, if it ever was that. Today war is waged by means never before associated with militarism, but rather with human rights and with programs of constitutional empowerment. Today the provisions of liberal democracy are abused by concealed, malign manipulators of affairs who aim to exterminate and to terrorise with massive bombs and other forms of slaughter. Anglo-Saxon culture has been destroyed by British criminal elements resolved to confiscate the world’s strategic mineral resources on grounds derived from their earlier experience as the stewards and governors of colonialism. Those criminal elements abused the Irish quest for independence in forcing Britain to covertly continue its colonization of foreign countries through confiscation of their mineral resources. Their modus operandi is to exacerbate socio-economic decay through the breakdown of discipline, so that evils can be introduced unseen and can be disguised as virtues through interminable insinuation by the mass media – obtaining purchase upon insufficiently protected national resources in the process.

The most important thing that the public now needs to realize is this: In a world where terrorism in India results from the frustration of criminal elements associated with British special interests to obtain Zimbabwe’s diamonds and platinum, the international police has a duty to require from the media that clear correspondences be drawn between matters presently given out as wholly unrelated, and that spurious associations be discontinued. The most recent terrorist attack supplies as good an example as could be wished for. Media-induced pre-occupation with south Asian politics will obfuscate the link with resources owners requiring compliance from India with respect to its African relations in the procurement of commodities.

The criminal element responsible for terrorism maintains its advantage through media strategy. It is as much as the International Police can do to remain ahead of a cynical game against criminals casting themselves into the role of righteous judges and relegating the police to the status of criminals. Similarly, the new American liberalism was brought about by the British resources special interests in control of the mass media under consideration in this essay, as the case also was with South Africa. The pretence sustained in the global mass media is that a benign liberal regime has made a contract with the developing world to rid it of a tyrannous conservative America, thus to bring about world peace and freedom for all. Unfortunately the USA was never half as tyrannous as the power now in control of the world, which confiscates the strategic mineral resources of the previously colonized developing countries that trust it.

The new American liberalism is therefore an abomination that will cost the human race its experiment with modernism. Humankind will return to life in a state of nature, for the simple reason that it is offered no choice in the matter: barbarism in possession of technology reduces the chances of human survival, whereas barbarism, or any other mode of being, without technology, does not threaten human survival. And barbarism has proved that nothing can prevent it from ascending to the level of absolute power in a technological world. Unless the media be subjected to rigorous testing for veracity in every matter reported upon, and severe punishments be prosecuted against those responsible for deception, modernism must necessarily fail. But it is late in the day to launch programs of that nature.